PEUDO BARON LOUIS &#160;FORINO KNIGHT OF MALTA AND SCATA OF ENGLAND

The true contacts of this firm are:

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-ernst-a-brandenberg.html

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

Gründer und Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-manuel-brandenberg.html

Dr. Manuel Brandenberg

Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Executive M.B.L.-HSG

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton Knight of Malta and Templar of England

Just perform a call. We have done this. They replied that they receive weekly, tens of complaints on Luigi Forino, all complaints registered with Interpol and the Swiss Police and Law Authorities that remain slow for reacting.

In all cases, mad pseudo baron Luigi Forino is liquidating some of his fake companies, see this link with MCC investment :

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

The shaper is being tightening around this new Dr. Mabuse and his mad organization.

They will soon fall down.

Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton

Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton Knight of Malta and Templar of England

giovedì 26 gennaio 2012

BARON OF LITTLE STAUGHTON

Stocton (x cent.); Tochestone (xi cent.); Stotton, Scotton, Stokton, Magna Stouton (xiii cent.); Stowghton (xv cent.); Moche Stoughton (xvi cent.).

This large parish, which comprises an area of 6,407 acres, lies on the borders of Bedfordshire and in 1921 had a population of 685 persons. The banks of the River Kym, which runs through it, are about 80 ft. above the ordnance datum and the land rises to a little over 200 ft. to the north and south. The soil is chiefly clay with a gravel subsoil in the south. The parish was mainly woodland down to the 13th century, when it seems, from the licences to assart lands, the timber was being cleared. There is still a good deal of woodland about Agden and Perry, but the land is mainly arable growing wheat and beans.

The principal part of the village has grown up as a roadside settlement along the main road from St. Neots to Kimbolton. The village street here has been known since the 16th century as Staughton Highway. (fn. 1) At its eastern end the road crosses the River Kym by a bridge which was in the early 16th century called Wrong Bridge. (fn. 2) Along the street are some picturesque 17th-century timber-framed houses; the White Hart Inn, on the north side, has a gable projecting towards the road and a way for carriages to the yard behind under a modern wing on the east side. On the north side of Staughton Highway is what is called the village cross of the unusual date of 1637. It consists of a base of modern brickwork supporting a stone octagonal shaft with rolls divided by hollows on a square-splayed base; the shaft has a moulded capital upon which is a cube with a panel bearing the inscription '1637, E.I.' on the north side and a sundial on the south, the whole being surmounted by a ball. There are several other half-timber and brick houses in the village street. The church, with the earlier settlement consisting of a few houses and cottages and a 17th-century inn, a smithy and a windmill, is about a third of a mile to the west of the Highway on a bye-road to Pertenhall (co. Bed.). Some of the houses here are of the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The road again crosses the River Kym by a bridge, called Staughton Bridge in 1509. (fn. 3) The vicarage (standing on the north side of the road, a little east of the church, which is on the south side) was built in 1852 by the Rev. A. B. Wilson, then incumbent, who, for publication of an essay in Essays and Reviews for which he was prosecuted, was suspended from his benefice for a year, but obtained a reversal of the decision on an appeal to the Privy Council. The house now called the Rectory Farm, but formerly known as the Hermitage, was the old vicarage, nearly rebuilt for the purpose at the end of the 18th century. (fn. 4)

Great Staughton: Place House before restoration

To the north-west of the church, on the opposite side of the road, is Place House, originally built on the site probably of a moated grange of the Charterhouse, by Sir Oliver Leader about 1539, when he acquired the Rectory Manor. (fn. 5) Here he imparked a considerable amount of land, which led to riots by the adjoining tenants, who claimed rights over it. He was residing here at the time of his death in 1557. The house built by him was a large, somewhat irregularly planned brick house of two stories, with tiled roof. It consisted of a main block, and north and south wings, with stone mullioned windows and doorways of Tudor type. A fire in the middle of the 17th century destroyed most of the house, leaving little but the south wing. It seems to have been partially restored and rebuilt about the middle of the 17th century. The greater part of the existing building belongs to this period. The interior has few of the original fittings. In the west front is an arcade of three bays in brick with four centred arches of two chamfered orders opening to a loggia. In the grounds are two barns of timber framing filled with brick nogging, probably contemporary with the house built by Sir Oliver Leader.

The lands south of the village apparently belonged to the chief manor, the manor house of which stood in the moated inclosure about a mile south-west of the church, now known as the Old Manor Farm. Here stood an interesting fortified manor house built probably about 1274 by Adam de Creting, which for nearly four centuries was the home of the Cretings and Wautons. The site has been already described. (fn. 6) The earthworks with double moats and the buildings were of great strength and withstood what was practically a siege in 1624. (fn. 7) The house was said to have been in great decay in 1705 and was probably allowed to fall into complete ruin. Staughton House, standing near the church in a park of 500 acres, was built as the manor house of the Rectory in the early part of the 18th century. The house was rebuilt, but the stables belong to the 18th-century building. Just outside the grounds of Staughton House, on its south-west side, is Garden Farm, built in the 16th century but altered a century later. There is another homestead moat marking the site of a medieval house, near Crown Farm, on the county boundary. (fn. 8)

To the north-east of the village is the hamlet of Dillington, and about a mile and a half from the village is Gaynes Hall, which takes its name from the family of Engayne, by whom the original house was probably built as the hall of their manor of Dillington. Viel de Engayne was evidently living here in 1238 when he had licence to have his private chapel at his manor of Dillington. References to St. Mary's Way and the road leading to St. Mary's Chapel indicate perhaps the dedication of the chapel. The park, now comprising some 300 acres, existed in the 13th century under the names of Littlehey and East Park. All that remain of the Engaynes' dwelling are the fragments of the moat; some worked stones of an ecclesiastical character may have formed a part of the chapel, but were more probably brought from the site of a neighbouring monastery, as they include the head and shoulders of an abbot with a crozier which are unlikely to have belonged to the chapel. (fn. 9) The present house is modern, but there are remains of the 17th-century house, probably built by Sir James Beverley, who purchased the manor in 1664 and died at Gaynes Hall in 1670.

At West Perry, another hamlet further north-east, is the Manor Farm, a moated brick house of the 16th century partially rebuilt in modern time. It may have been the manor house of the representative of one of the coheirs of Dillington manor when the manor was divided into moieties. (fn. 10)

The hamlet of Beachampstead, which included Agden, lies to the north of the village. The site of the manor house of the Beaufoys may perhaps be identified by the homestead moat north-east of Staughton Green. The house, we are told, was burnt and devastated in the middle of the 14th century, and there is no evidence that it was rebuilt. (fn. 11)

A farmhouse on the north bank of Duloe Brook opposite Bushmead Priory represents the former manor of Blaysworth.

MANORS

Lands in Staughton, with 100 mancosa of gold, were bequeathed by Ælfhelm, by deed undated, to Leofsige and his wife. (fn. 12) She may have been the widow Livith, Leofwina, or Lefgiva, who granted Staughton, with Dillington, Gravely, and Yelling, to the abbey of Ramsey. (fn. 13) Livith's gift was confirmed to the abbey by King Edgar in 974; (fn. 14) by Edward the Confessor in 1060; (fn. 15) by William the Conqueror in 1078; (fn. 16) and by Pope Alexander in 1178. (fn. 17) But Staughton, its original value of £10 unchanged, was entered in the Domesday Survey among the lands of the Bishop of Lincoln, and though the abbot of Ramsey claimed it against him at that time, (fn. 18) the bishops of Lincoln remained in undisturbed possession. (fn. 19) Their tenure of the manor, as of their manor of Buckden, was recorded as late as 1612. (fn. 20) Six hides of land with 100 acres of underwood were held by the Bishop of Lincoln in 1086, his under-tenant being Eustace, probably the sheriff. In 1166 William de Eynesford held 6 knights' fees of the bishop, (fn. 21) who made a grant of a sheaf from each acre of his demesne in Staughton to Hinchingbroke Priory, which was confirmed by the Bishop of Lincoln between 1186 and 1198. (fn. 22) He was succeeded by a son Roger de Eynesford, whose son William died before 1194 (fn. 23) leaving a widow Eleanor, who married Hugh de Beauchamp. (fn. 24) William, son of the last-named William, in 1203 obtained licence to disafforest his manor of Staughton and to have free warren. (fn. 25) He died in or about 1231, when the custody of Staughton was delivered to the bishop, as overlord, during the minority of the heir, (fn. 26) William de Eynesford. This last William left coheirs, possibly daughters, who were represented in 1265 by Nicholas de Crioll and William Heringaud or Herengod, perhaps husbands of the coheirs, who, after the Battle of Evesham, were thought to be rebels. (fn. 27) They are later described as parceners of the inheritance of William de Eynesford. (fn. 28) It would appear that Nicholas de Crioll married firstly Maud, probably the daughter of William de Eynesford, (fn. 29) by whom he had three daughters, Nicholaa, Margery, and Beatrice, (fn. 30) and secondly Joan, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent), by whom he had a son Nicholas, a minor at the time of his father's death in 1273. (fn. 31) Of the daughters, who inherited their mother's property, Nicholaa married Adam de Creting, (fn. 32) Margery seems to have died unmarried, and Beatrice married Anselm de Gyse. (fn. 33) Before the death of Maud, Nicholas's first wife, her moiety of the manor was conveyed to Roger de Leyburne. William Heringaud, who married the other coheir of William de Eynesford, succeeded his father Stephen in 1257 to the possessions in Kent. (fn. 34) William died before 1273, leaving a daughter Emma, but in 1293 the heir of Stephen is said to have been Christine wife of William de Kirkeby, from which it would appear that Emma died unmarried, so that the interest in her mother's moiety would pass to her cousins, the Criolls. (fn. 35) William Heringaud, however, had conveyed the interest of his wife's moiety of Staughton to Roger de Leyburne, who thus held the whole manor. (fn. 36) About 1271 Roger de Leyburne and Eleanor de Vaux, Countess of Winchester, his wife, exchanged the manor of Staughton, which they had of the gift of Nicholas de Crioll and William Heringaud, with Roger de Rolling and Maud, daughter of William de Eshetesford (Ashford), his wife, for lands in Kent and Sussex. (fn. 37) About this time the coheirs of Nicholas de Crioll claimed that the grant to Roger de Leyburne was void, as Nicholas held only by courtesy in right of his wife; consequently in 1274 the escheator was ordered to give seisin of a moiety of the manor of Staughton to Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice. (fn. 38) By 1279 Margery de Crioll and Emma Heringaud were probably dead, as Adam de Creting and Anselm de Gyse are said to have held the whole manor. (fn. 39) The question whether Maud de Crioll (Kyriel) (fn. 40) was seised in her demesne as of fee of the manor of Great Staughton, of which one moiety was held by Adam de Creting and Nicholaa, and the other by Anselm de Gyse and Beatrice, was brought before the justices of assize in 1286 and the case was adjourned to Westminster, Adam de Rolling being vouched to warrant. (fn. 41) The Crioll title became established and in the same year Adam and Anselm were said to hold the manor with view of frankpledge and free warren. (fn. 42) By a series of conveyances, the whole manor and the advowson became vested in Adam de Creting and Nicholaa his wife. (fn. 43) In 1295 Adam died seised of the manor described as the manor of GREAT STAUGHTON, BLAYSWORTH and LA MORE held, with the advowson, of the Bishop of Lincoln by 4 knights' fees, and leaving a son and heir John. (fn. 44) Custody of the lands of Adam was in 1296 granted to Thomas de Creting, (fn. 45) and a fresh inquisition was taken two years later, when the age of John, previously given as 17–19, was returned both as 24 and as unknown, because he had been born in Wales. (fn. 46) John de Creting was holding the vill in 1316 (fn. 47) and in 1327–8, (fn. 48) and received a grant of free warren in his demesne lands in 1330. (fn. 49) He seems to have been succeeded by another John, probably his son, at whose death the manor passed to Edmund de Creting his brother, (fn. 50) who in 1337 obtained protection on setting out in the king's service in France. (fn. 51) Hawise, widow of the younger John, held a third of the manor and advowson in dower in 1348, the remaining two-thirds being in the hands of Sir Edmund de Creting. Sir Edmund granted the two-thirds of the advowson held by him, and the reversion of the third held by Hawise, to John de Abynton, citizen and clothier of London. (fn. 52) Hawise married Geoffrey de Drayton and by deed dated at Great Staughton in 1353 Edmund granted the third of the manor held by Hawise in dower to Geoffrey for life and sold the reversion to John Empol. In 1370, after the death of Hawise, Geoffrey de Drayton claimed a life tenancy under the grant of 1353. Meanwhile, John Empol had granted this third to Thomas de Wauton or Walton, a minor, son of Thomas de Wauton, and action was postponed until Thomas should be of full age. (fn. 53) The conveyance to Thomas Wauton was repeated when he came of age in 1376. (fn. 54) The other two parts of the manor passed to Alice Bray, who in 1385–6 conveyed them to John de Hemingford and others, evidently feoffees, who reconveyed them to her. (fn. 55) They were again settled in the same years (fn. 56) and in 1406 the whole manor was conveyed by John Stukeley and Robert Scott, two of the feoffees, to Thomas Wauton and Elizabeth his wife. (fn. 57) It would seem that Thomas de Wauton, who married Eleanor de Stokes of Boughton in Southoe (q.v.), had a son Thomas, aged 30, in 1349. His son Thomas was the grantee of the third of the manor in 1376 when he came of age, (fn. 58) and it was he and his wife Elizabeth who in 1406 acquired the whole manor. (fn. 59) He was succeeded by John de Wauton, his son or more probably his brother, who was returned as member of parliament for Huntingdonshire in 1393. Thomas, son of John, served from 1396 for 30 years as member of parliament for Huntingdonshire or Bedfordshire and became Speaker of the House in 1425. (fn. 60) He died in 1436 and was succeeded by his son Thomas. The manor later passed to Robert Wauton, mentioned in 1502 as lord of the manor. (fn. 61) John son of Robert married Joan, sister of Sir William Gascoyne, on whom the manor was settled about 1497. Joan after John's death married Thomas Knighton, and in 1529 Thomas Wauton of Great Staughton, the elder, and Thomas Wauton, the younger, were sued for forcibly entering the lands held in dower by Joan. (fn. 62) Thomas Wauton, the elder, was the son of John. (fn. 63) Thomas Wauton, the younger, his son, was dealing with lands in Great Staughton in 1541, (fn. 64) and in 1554 settled annuities payable out of the manor on his sons William and Gilbert. He died in 1555, his heir being his grandson George, son of his son Thomas. (fn. 65) In 1563 George Wauton conveyed the manor to Henry Laurence and William Thomas, (fn. 66) probably in connexion with a lease of the manor for 21 years to Thomas Beverley in 1562. In the course of Chancery proceedings it was alleged that while 'a young man, void of learning and knowledge in common affairs of the world,' George Wauton had made this conveyance to Thomas Beverley, 'a crafty and subtyll man,' the property being well worth £80 a year, in return for the sum of £80, of which he received £50 in hand, with 2 nags worth 5 marks, and a lute worth 5s. (fn. 67) Thomas Beverley must have retained possession of the lease, which he assigned in 1579 to John Farewell (fn. 68) at the rent of £34. In 1605 Sir George Wauton, who had been knighted at Whitehall by the king in the previous year, (fn. 69) was dealing with the manor and advowson, evidently in performance of a settlement of the manor made in that year on himself for life, with remainder to the heir male or issue male of John Wauton, deceased, son of Nicholas Wauton, deceased, uncle of Sir George, and second brother of Thomas Wauton, deceased, father of Sir George. (fn. 70) Sir George died in 1606 at Great Staughton without lawful issue, (fn. 71) when his heir male under the above settlement was the future regicide and brother-in-law of the Protector, Valentine Wauton, then a boy of twelve, the son of Nicholas Wauton, and grandson of John Wauton. (fn. 72) After Valentine Wauton had attained his majority, possession of the manor was again disputed, and something like a siege seems to have been sustained in 1624 by the old manor house, then in the possession of his kinsman, one of the heirs of Sir George, John Throgmorton. In January Sir Robert Osborne wrote from Godmanchester to Secretary Conway that the sheriff, going by commission from Chancery to take possession of the manor from John Throgmorton and deliver it to Mr. Wauton, was resisted and several of his men slain or wounded; he added that the house was double moated and of great strength, and that the company, most of whom were Papists, had intrenched themselves in it, with aid of divers foreigners who had joined them. (fn. 73) In March he wrote to the Council that he had made proclamation at Great Staughton against John Throgmorton, but found the house had been abandoned, and therefore placed ten men in it, till directions were sent as to who was to be put in possession. (fn. 74) The abandonment was possibly a ruse and evidently temporary, as on May 25th he wrote that John Throgmorton had surprised the sequestrators and taken forcible possession of the manor house, refusing to give up his servant Allabone, indicted for the death of one of the sheriff's men, but promising to surrender the house, if so ordered, when the Council had answered his petition. (fn. 75) Valentine Wauton was in 1651 (fn. 76) and 1657 (fn. 77) dealing with the manor, for possession of which there was keen competition after the Restoration in 1660, even before Col. Wauton's attainder was passed, between Robert Montague Lord Mandeville, son and heir-apparent of Edward Earl of Manchester, and Sir Charles Howard, the former succeeding in 1661 in obtaining a lease of the manor, site, chief messuage, etc., for 31 years, in spite of the king's intention to grant it to the Duke of York. (fn. 78) In the same year Sir Edward Green petitioned for a lease of 500 acres of pasture land in Great Staughton and 400 of fen ground, part of the estate there forfeited for treason by Valentine Wauton, (fn. 79) who is said to have lived disguised in Holland and worked there as a gardener till he died. John Gaule, minister of the parish, was a petitioner in 1660 for satisfaction of arrears from Wauton's confiscated estates. He represented that Valentine Wauton had detained for 6 years the benefits of his living, valued at above £400 a year, from the petitioner, who had been kept prisoner by Cromwell and Ireton for declaring the war against the king unlawful. (fn. 80) In 1662 the reversion of the manor, with a rent reserved upon the lease to Robert Montague Lord Mandeville, was granted to the Duke of York; (fn. 81) by whom, as King James II, a grant for 21 years in reversion was made in 1688 to Sir Theophilus Oglethorpe. (fn. 82) A fresh lease of the manor, site, etc., reciting these former grants, was granted in 1691 to William Harbord, of Grafton Park (co. Northampton) for 99 years. (fn. 83) It was followed by a grant made in 1705 to Dame Eleanor Oglethorpe, releasing her from any covenant entered into by her husband under the lease to him to keep the premises in repair, and permitting William Harbord to use the material of the chief messuage to repair and build all other messuages, outbuildings, etc. (fn. 84) (the chief messuage was described as then in great ruin and decay, and Sir Theophilus had undertaken to put it into good and substantial repair within 3 years of the grant to himself). In 1671 John Darbishire and Elizabeth his wife, apparently under a settlement, granted for the life of Elizabeth the manor and advowson to George Montague. Elizabeth died probably before 1684, when Charles Wauton, son of the regicide, conveyed to Richard Derbishire and Matthew Swallow, (fn. 85) and in the same year with his wife Frances to Richard Graham and Richard Bell, with warranty against the heirs of Frances. (fn. 86)

Crioll. Gules a chief or.

Creting. Argent a cheveron between three molets gules.

Wauton. Argent a cheveron sable.

The property next appears in the hands of William Harbord, who bequeathed it to his four daughters as tenants in common. (fn. 87) His daughters were Dame Mary Ayscough, widow of Sir Edward Ayscough, kt.; Grace, wife of Thomas Hatcher; Margaret, wife of Robert Lord Kingston; and Letitia, afterwards Dame Letitia Winn. Before her death without issue, in 1698, Lady Kingston, with her sisters Dame Mary Ayscough and Dame Letitia Winn, had empowered Grace Hatcher, by indentures of 1689 and 1696, to dispose by will of her share, which she bequeathed to Philip Doughty, of Snarford Hall (co. Lincoln). Philip Doughty died in 1710, leaving a son, George Brownlow Doughty, who married Frances Tichborne, and died in 1743, his wife surviving until 1765. Their son, Henry Doughty, in 1768 conveyed his fourth part of the remainder of the lease to Peter Earl Ludlow. (fn. 88) Before the inclosure award of 1806 this lease had expired, and the king, George III, was returned as lord of this manor, his lessee being George Parker, who was also lord of the Rectory Manor of Great Staughton. (fn. 89) The Crown is still lord of the manor.

The RECTORY MANOR was of considerable value in the 13th century, its lands extending into Dillington and Beachampstead. (fn. 90) It was held by the incumbent until the rectory was granted to the Charterhouse, London, by Richard II in 1381 and confirmed in 1394. A vicarage was then ordained and the manor appropriated to the Charterhouse, which held it until the Dissolution. It was granted in 1539 to Oliver Leader (Leder) of London and his wife Frances, with lands in Great Staughton. (fn. 91) The Leaders had for a long time been connected with Great Staughton. Thomas Leader was attorney for Edmund Creting in 1348. (fn. 92) John Fisher of Great Staughton was pardoned in 1402 for killing John Leader in 1400 in self-defence. (fn. 93) Thomas Leader died in 1502 seised of a messuage and lands in the parish, and was succeeded by a son and heir Stephen, (fn. 94) who later engaged in a lawsuit about land in Great Staughton. (fn. 95) The Leaders, after acquisition of this manor, evidently made it their country seat.

Leader. Or a fesse between three roundels sable, with a scallop argent on each roundel and a lion's bead razed between two boars' heads or upon the fesse, all within a border engrailed azure.

In 1543 Oliver Leader and Frances his wife acquired from Walter Devereux Lord Ferrers of Chartley, and Richard his son and heir, Whitley Wood and Rushoe, (fn. 96) which were held thereafter with this manor. In 1545 Oliver, who was one of the six clerks of Chancery, was proceeded against for alleged unlawful arrest in a lawsuit as to land in Beachampstead in this parish: (fn. 97) he acted also as arbitrator with Thomas Wauton. (fn. 98) In 1554, when he was sheriff of the county, there were riots regarding inclosures in his parks of Rushoe and Whitley. He instituted proceedings against Robert Sapcote and others who had in warlike manner broken down hedges, shot with crossbows at the keeper and his wife in the lodge, and at other servants whom they had driven into the moat surrounding the lodge, and killed and maimed deer. (fn. 99) Oliver Leader, in his pleadings, described these parks as consisting of 100 acres of pasture and 100 acres of wood, time out of mind imparked and replenished with deer, the ditches and hedges of which he had caused, about sixteen years before, to be newly scoured and amended, and there also made a great ditch and quickset hedge about the park for the safe keeping of his cattle, which he had peaceably enjoyed during the reign of Henry VIII, and until the December of the riot. Sir Oliver Leader, who had been knighted, (fn. 100) and his wife, Dame Frances, made settlements in 1550 and 1554, (fn. 101) and both died without issue in 1557, seised of the Rectory Manor and advowson and of the parks called Rushoe and Whitley in Great Staughton and Hail Weston, and of a chief messuage in Great Staughton, (fn. 102) which 'at the dayes of their deaths they did inhabit.' (fn. 103) This was obviously Place House, in view of Leland's note in the Itinerary: 'From St. Neots to Staughton Village by sum inclosed ground a 3 miles. . . Ther hard by the church is a praty house of Olyver Leaders and pratie comodities about it.' (fn. 104) Thomas Baldwin, the uncle and heir of Frances Leader, immediately on inheriting this manor, made a grant in July 1558, to Sir James Dyer, Chief Justice, (fn. 105) and his wife Margaret, of the chief messuage, 4 closes of pasture adjoining, the conduit, conduit head, pipes, etc., and the close where they stood, of Rusho Park with the house or lodge there, of other closes, including Rusho Stocking, Whitley Close, the Stocking, the Hall Yard or Garth and house built in the same, parcel whereof was held of the manor of Beachampstead, and of Priors Pasture (100 acres), with a cottage or house, in Great Staughton and Kimbolton, parcel of the possessions of the late priory of Stonley, and covenanted not to alienate or sell any of the residue of the lands of the late Frances Leader within 4 miles compass of Staughton, or to make any lease of the parsonage without consent of Sir James Dyer, if he should be disposed to purchase for himself or his friends any parcel of the same, or the lease of the parsonage. Thomas Baldwin died at Clerkenwell in 1560, leaving a son and heir John, who succeeded him in the manor, (fn. 106) where the Dyers continued to hold the chief messuage, etc., of the Baldwins. Sir James Dyer received a grant of land in Great Staughton in 1560–1, (fn. 107) and in 1568 some fresh lease of the rectory appears to have been made by John Baldwin. (fn. 108) Sir James died in 1580 (his wife Margaret had predeceased him in 1560), and was buried at Great Staughton. (fn. 109) In 1582 his grandnephew and successor, Sir Richard Dyer, instituted proceedings against George Wauton, apparently consequent upon an endeavour by George Wauton to assert some title in the property leased to the Dyers, as it was complained that George Wauton had forcibly entered the chief messuage, base court, etc., and damaged the conduit and watercourse which Elizabeth, George Wauton's mother, had 'suffered the late Sir James Dyer to quietly hold.' (fn. 110) Sir Richard was also in the same year defendant in a suit brought against him by James Farewell, of Great Staughton (fn. 111) (where the Farewells held, under assignment, a lease of the Crown or Cretingbury Manor from George Wauton). James Farewell asserted that he had occupied and enjoyed the rectory or parsonage house as tenant-at-will under Sir James Dyer, who by word of mouth and a codicil promised to be made in his will (as Sir Richard, his cousin and heir, should witness) had intended him to remain tenant after his death. Sir Richard denied the claim of James Farewell to hold the parsonage, mansion house, etc., for the alleged rent of £10, and certain supplies of wheat, malt, pease, straw and brawne for the provision of the house of Sir James. (fn. 112) Sir Richard died at Fetter Lane, London, in 1605, and his son, Sir William (aged 22), succeeded him in the chief messuage, Conduit Close, Rushoe Park, etc. (fn. 113) Sir William Dyer, of Great Staughton, in 1607 mortgaged lands in Great Staughton and Kimbolton, his sureties being Sir Edward Harrington, Bart., and William Fitzwilliams, who in 1614 instituted with him Chancery proceedings to recover the land 'given as security in his extreme youth,' from Gabriel and Roger Tudor. (fn. 114) There is a reference in 1613 to Sir William Dyer's Hall at Great Staughton, (fn. 115) where he was succeeded in 1621 by his son, Sir Lodovick Dyer, created a baronet in 1627. (fn. 116) Sir Lodovick in 1645 compounded for his demesnes at Great Staughton. (fn. 117) He died without surviving issue in 1669, and was buried at Colmworth, in Bedfordshire. (fn. 118) He probably sold Place House together with the manor of Beachampstead in 1653, and it has passed with that manor (q.v.) ever since.

Dyer. Sable three goats passant argent.

Meanwhile the Baldwins had continued to hold the manor, and John Baldwin (fn. 119) made a settlement of the manor, rectory and advowson of Great Staughton held of the king in chief, except a messuage called the Hermitage and a tenement, formerly Lancasters, on the marriage of his son Thomas with Judith, daughter of Thomas Hawes, in 1599. He died in 1611, (fn. 120) leaving a son and heir, Thomas, aged 40. In 1621 Thomas Baldwin and his wife Judith conveyed the manor, rectory and advowson to his son John, (fn. 121) and later John and his wife Anne were dealing with the manor. (fn. 122) The advowson is said to have been sold by John in 1631 to the Viscountess Campden, and from her it passed to Archbishop Laud. Laud gave it to St. John's College, Cambridge, of which he was president, who are still the owners. (fn. 123) The rectory manor and advowson became separated after the sale to Lady Campden, the manor being retained by the Baldwins. John Baldwin died in 1657, and was buried at Staughton, where there is a tombstone to Robert Baldwin (d. 1678), who was presumably the Robert Baldwin dealing with an estate here in 1663. (fn. 124) Sir John Conyers, bt., of Horden (co. Durham), married in 1675 Mary, daughter of Edward Newman of Folkesworth and kinswoman of Robert Baldwin, who refers to Conyers in his will as his adopted son and left him residuary legatee. (fn. 125) John Conyers was apparently residing at Great Staughton in 1678, for a monument to his daughter Mary, who died in that year, was erected in the church. Sir Baldwin Conyers, his son, succeeded him in 1719, and was dealing with the rectory and lands in Great Staughton in 1720. (fn. 126) Sir Baldwin died in 1731, leaving only daughters, and was buried at Great Staughton with his son John, who predeceased him in 1729. The Conyers are said to have been succeeded in this rectory manor by Peter Ludlow, created baron in 1755, and Earl Ludlow in 1760. The remainder of the lease of one-fourth of the crown manor was sold to him in 1768, and after his death in 1803 the manor was apparently purchased by George Parker, who is returned as lord of the rectory manor and lessee of the crown manor in 1806. (fn. 127) Parker was succeeded by General Denzil Onslow (d. 1838), and he by his son Denzil (d. 1879). After being next held in succession by W. J. Raffety, Robert Worthe, and Edward Robotham, the rectory manor passed to Harry Pickersgill-Cunliffe (grandson of John Pickersgill), who was holding it before 1906, and died in 1919. His only surviving child, Enid Saffron, who married as her second husband Captain E. H. Duberly, M.C., late Grenadier Guards, is now lady of the manor.

Baldwin. Party azure and or a fleur de lis between three crescents countercoloured.

The manor of DILLINGTON, Dellingtune, Dilincthon (xi cent.), Dylington (xiii cent.), was granted, with the manor of Great Staughton (q.v.), to the abbey of Ramsey, which retained the overlordship as late as 1518. (fn. 128) The 6 hides there entered in the Domesday Survey among the lands of the abbot had fallen in value from £6 in 1066 to £4 in 1086. (fn. 129) Between 1091 and 1100 Ralph, 'dapifer regis,' brother of Ilger, received a grant from Abbot Aldwin and the abbey of the vill of Dillington for life at £3 rent. (fn. 130) This manor, which pertained to the barony of the abbey, (fn. 131) was for over two centuries and a half held of the abbey by the Engaynes, Dengaynes (Gaynes). The first member of the family whom we find holding Dillington was Richard de Engayne, who in 1166, as one of the knights of the abbey, was holding 6 hides there. He married Sarah, daughter of William de Chesney, and died in 1208. (fn. 132) His elder son Richard died without issue and was succeeded by his brother, Vitalis or Viel, who in 1238 had licence to have a chapel in his manor of Dillington. (fn. 133) He assarted his woods at Dillington, and gave leave for assarting his wood between St. Mary Way and Wepetes towards Grafham, and his wood of Dudenhey, and common of pasture in his foreign wood called Westwood as far as the road leading from the chapel of St. Mary to Perry. (fn. 134) In 1244 he acknowledged the abbot's claim to the service of one knight and suit of court at Broughton from his lands at Dillington. (fn. 135) He died in 1248, and was succeeded by his eldest surviving son Henry, (fn. 136) who died without issue in 1271, seised of the manor of Dillington and the parks called Littlehey and Est Park. He was succeeded by his brother John, (fn. 137) who was returned in 1279 as holding 300 acres in demesne and a windmill. (fn. 138) John was succeeded by his son John in 1296, (fn. 139) who married Ellen, daughter of Robert FitzRoger, and in 1303 received a grant of free warren. (fn. 140) He complained in 1316 that John de Littlebury and others had broken into his park and carried off his deer. (fn. 141) In 1318 he settled the manor on his wife Ellen. (fn. 142) After his death without issue in 1322, (fn. 143) the manor was held as dower by his widow Ellen, who died in 1339. (fn. 144) John's heir was his nephew John, son of his brother Nicholas, who married Joan, daughter of Robert Peverel, and died in 1358. (fn. 145) His eldest son John, a minor, died in his father's lifetime; his widow, another Joan, married before 1358 William de Colville. Thomas, second son of John the elder, settled the manor on his wife Katherine, daughter of the Earl of Devon, and died without issue in 1367. (fn. 146) He was succeeded by his three sisters and coheirs: Joyce, married to John de Goldington; Elizabeth, married to Laurence de Pabenham; and Mary, married to William de Bernak, who were also the heirs of John de Offord through their mother Joan. John de Goldington and his wife Joyce were dealing, in 1369, with a part of the manor. (fn. 147) A partition of the property of Thomas Engayne made in 1372 between his coheirs comprised this manor, (fn. 148) and they were dealing with a portion of it in 1374. (fn. 149) The whole manor was in the hands of Sir William Bernak and his wife Mary in 1376, when a settlement of it in tail was made upon them. (fn. 150) Mary, having married secondly Thomas de la Zouche, died in 1401. (fn. 151) Her son, Sir John de Bernak, who succeeded, died in 1408, leaving a nine-year-old son and heir John, (fn. 152) who died while a minor in 1421, a few days before a younger brother Edmund, their two sisters, Joan and Mary, being the coheirs of the brothers. (fn. 153) Mary, who survived her sister, married Robert Stonham, and they were dealing with the manor in 1427, (fn. 154) when it was held for half a knight's fee. (fn. 155) Mary died a widow in 1464, (fn. 156) when her trustees granted an annuity out of the manor. (fn. 157) Mary Stonham had a son Robert, whose daughter and heir Elizabeth married John Broughton of Toddington (co. Bed.). (fn. 158) They had a son John, who married Anne Denston (d. 1481). It would appear that John and Anne had two sons, John, who died a minor, and Sir Robert, who succeeded to the estates and made a settlement of the manors of Gaynes or Gaynes Hall and Dillington, as the property was then called, on his marriage with Dorothy, sister of Richard Wentworth, and died in 1506. (fn. 159) His heir was his son John, who died in 1518, leaving a son and heir John, aged six at his father's death. A settlement was made for the proposed marriage of John Broughton, the son, with Dorothy, daughter of Thomas Duke of Norfolk, with remainder to John's (the father's) brother Robert (d. 1521). (fn. 160) John, son of John, died in 1529 while still a minor, leaving two sisters, Katherine and Anne, as his coheirs. They had livery of their lands in that year. (fn. 161) The wardship of Katherine was delivered to Agnes Duchess of Norfolk, (fn. 162) and that of Anne apparently to Sir Thomas Cheyne, to whom she was married. (fn. 163) Katherine was married to Agnes's son William, Lord Howard, before 1531, (fn. 164) and their only child married William Paulet, Marquis of Winchester, (fn. 165) with whom in 1592 she conveyed the site of the manor of Gaynes Hall to William Wallopp and Richard Beckenshaw. (fn. 166) The marquis died in 1598, and in 1599 his widow was dealing with the manor. (fn. 167) Later in the same year, with Sir Giles Broughton, kt., and his wife Katherine, her daughter, she conveyed to Oliver Williams, alias Cromwell, the uncle of the future Protector, the manors of Gaynes Hall, alias Gaynes Perry and Dillington. (fn. 168) In 1600 Oliver Cromwell, as of Godmanchester, assigned to Richard Cromwell of the same, his brother, a lease of Gaynes Park made to him in 1599 for 21 years by Agnes, Marchioness of Winchester, widow; (fn. 169) and in 1601 he, with his second wife Anne, conveyed the manors of Gaynes Hall, alias Gaynes Perry, alias Dillington, to Sir Thomas Lake, kt. (fn. 170)

In 1619 the manors of Gaynes Hall, alias Gaynes Perry and Dillington, with that of Grafham, were settled for the purpose of paying the heavy fines imposed on Sir Thomas Lake and Mary his wife (fn. 171) and Lady Roos, their daughter, for defamation of character of Lady Exeter. (fn. 172) Sir Thomas Lake died in 1629 at Canons (co. Middx.), where he lived in retirement. (fn. 173) His eldest son, Sir Thomas Lake, kt., settled the manors in 1634 and 1639, (fn. 174) and in 1636 he was prosecuting an appeal in the Court of Arches on behalf of John Franklin, his tenant at Gaines, concerning a demand by the minister, Mr. Gall, (fn. 175) and the churchwardens for repair of the church, described as then 'much ruinated.'

The year before his death, which took place in 1653, he conveyed the manor as Sir Thomas Lake, described as of Great Stanmore, Middlesex, kt., (fn. 176) and barred the entail created in 1619 upon himself and his brothers, Arthur who had died in 1633 and was survived by his widow Anne, and Lancelot who had died in 1646, leaving a son Lancelot, knighted at Whitehall in 1660. In 1663 Lancelot the son, with Dorothy and Elizabeth Lake, the daughters and coheirs of Sir Thomas Lake, his grandfather, Mary Lake, widow, William Bokenham and Matilda his wife, Richard Gedes, Thomas Mann and Elizabeth his wife, and Ann Bigg, widow, conveyed the manor to Thomas Harris, of the Inner Temple, (fn. 177) by whom and by Dorothy Lake, then his wife, with Elizabeth Lake her sister, and Thomas Mann of Yoxford, co. Suffolk, the manor in 1664 was sold in two moieties to Sir James Beverley, kt., of Lincoln's Inn, for £11,330. (fn. 178) Sir James Beverley was buried in 1670 in the Gaynes chapel in Great Staughton Church, and Thomas and James Beverley were dealing with the manor in 1674. (fn. 179) In 1693 it was vested in trustees for sale, and in 1698 it was sold, again for £11,330, to Sir Henry Summers, merchant, to whom it was conveyed by the trustees, with Thomas Webster of St. Martin-in-the-Fields and his wife Elizabeth, daughter and heir of James Beverley, late of Begura (Beggary ?), in Eaton, co. Bed., the eldest son of Sir James Beverley; Thomas Beverley the younger, of the Inner Temple, son of Thomas Beverley the elder, of London, and next brother of James Beverley, late of Gaynes, deceased (which James was the eldest son of Thomas Beverley the father), and Mary wife of the said Thomas Beverley; Robert Beverley, clerk, brother of the last named James and of Thomas Beverley party to the sale; Dame Priscilla Beverley of London, widow of Sir James Beverley; Anne Beverley of London, widow of James Beverley; Thomas Docwra of Putteridge (co. Herts), executor of Jane Beverley, deceased, daughter of Sir James Beverley, and Richard Prince. (fn. 180) The next owners of the manor seem to have been the Handasydes. Thomas Handasyde, at one time Governor of Jamaica, appears in the vicars' books in 1717, and died in 1729, when his son, General Roger Handasyde, Governor of Berwick in 1745, succeeded him at Gaynes, (fn. 181) and died in 1763. George Handasyde was dealing with the manor in 1769, (fn. 182) and in 1771 it was conveyed with the chief messuage, parks, etc., to Elizabeth Galley, of Great Russell Street, Bloomsbury, widow, as heretofore the property of Clifford and George Handasyde. (fn. 183) It was conveyed by her in 1777, together with the reversionary interest of John Cheshyre of Bennington (co. Herts.) and his wife Juliana, to Henry Galley. In 1786, for the purpose of barring the entail on Sir John Cheshyre, deceased, late of Isleworth (co. Middx.), kt., sergeant-at-law, it was released by Henry Galley to John Cheshyre and Julianna, and by them conveyed for settlement to Vicary Gibbs. (fn. 184) It was purchased about 1797 by Sir James Duberly, kt., who died in 1832. His eldest son, James Duberly of Gaynes Hall, who served in the 11th Light Dragoons, was present at Waterloo, and married Emily Hannah, daughter of Col. the Hon. William Grey, brother of the first Earl Grey. He died in 1864. His son William was a captain in the Grenadier Guards, and High Sheriff in 1884. He died in 1888, and was succeeded by his son Grey William Duberly, killed in action in 1915, whose widow, the Hon. Mrs. Duberly, now resides at Gaynes Hall, and her brother-in-law, Capt. Evelyn Hugh James Duberly, is now lord of the manor.

Handasyde. Argent a lion sable and a chief azure with three molets argent therein.

With the manor in Dillington, held of the Abbot of Ramsey from an early date, there had descended in the family of Engayne a property at PERRY (partly in Grafham, partly in Great Staughton) held of the fee of Lovetot. These properties descended together and were together divided into the moieties which became known as Gaynes Hall and Dillington. When, however, the moieties were reunited and Perry had come to be identified with them, the descriptions Gaynes Perry and Dillington Perry became adopted. (fn. 185)

Duberly. Vert a fesse between in the chief two sheaves or and in the foot a sickle argent with its bandle or, and on the fesse an arrow gules between two stars azure.

At the Domesday Survey a hide in Perry was held of the Sheriff Eustace by Aluuin Deule. Its value of 40s. in 1066 had remained unchanged in 1086; there was a church there, and woodland for pannage a league in length and 4 furlongs in breadth. (fn. 186) William de Perry was dealing with half a virgate in Perry in 1218–19. (fn. 187) In 1272 this property was in the hands of the Engaynes, who held it of Eustace's successors, the Lovetots, and Henry Engayne died seised of 100 acres of arable, 2 acres of meadow, and 15s. rent held for one hide of land of Roger de Lovetot. (fn. 188) Roger's heir was Thomas de Lovetot, (fn. 189) who in 1279 was holding Perry as half a knight's fee of the fee of Lovetot, and under him Henry Engayne's son John, who had in demesne in arable land 80 acres of old and 60 acres of new assart, for which he paid the king 2s. yearly. (fn. 190)

In this half-fee were evidently included 140 acres of arable in the field called Gerard Stocking in East Perry in Grafham held of John de Lovetot by the service of a quarter of a knight's fee by John D'Engayne at his death in 1323. (fn. 191) William de Perry was one of the principal tenants of Adam de Creting in his manor of Great Staughton in 1279. (fn. 192)

The manor of BEACHAMPSTEAD, Bichamestede (xii cent.); Brichamstede (xiii cent.); Bychamstede, Bischamstede (xiv cent.); Bechamstede (xvii cent.), was held at an early date of the honour of Huntingdon, and between 1140–53 Earl Simon de St. Liz gave to Odo de Danmartin lands there and in Southoe, which Earl Simon III (1153–84) confirmed to Aubrey de Danmartin (brother of Odo) and his son Reginald. (fn. 193) Rents from lands in Southoe and Beachampstead were paid by Reginald de Danmartin Count of Boulogne, in 1194 and 1197. (fn. 194) The lands seem to have been forfeited probably as lands of the Normans, and early in the 13th century came into the possession of Julian de la Haye, (fn. 195) who gave certain woods here as dower to Sanicula, the wife of his son Maurice. In 1231, when Sanicula had been a widow ten years, she brought an action against Parnell, widow of Saher de la Haye, apparently son of Maurice, who had died during his minority, regarding the lands of their dowries. (fn. 196) Three years earlier Parnell, daughter of Geoffrey, had brought an action against some of her tenants of Beachampstead for customs and services which she held in dower by gift of Saher, formerly her husband, the heir being under age. (fn. 197) This heir was probably Julian de la Haye, who claimed rights in the woods of Agden here in 1240–1 and 1248–9. (fn. 198)

Julian had been succeeded before 1271–2 by Ingelram del Hay, who in that year was dealing with land in Beachampstead. (fn. 199)

By 1279 the manor had become deeply subinfeudated. The quarter of a fee in Beachampstead was held of Robert de Brus as of the honour of Huntingdon by Ingelram de la Hay, of Ingelram by Henry de Walpole, and of Henry by Geoffrey Beaufuy (Beaufoe, Beufitz, de Bealfo, or de Belafago). With his messuage there Geoffrey Beaufuy held 180 acres of arable land; the mowing of Mockespol Meadow and keeping of Agden Wood were included among the services of his villeins. (fn. 200)

One of the mesne lordships was probably eliminated in 1281 by the grant of 2 carucates in Beachampstead from Henry de Walpole and his wife Isabella to Geoffrey de Beaufuy and his wife Amice. (fn. 201) In 1356 Alice, widow of John Beaufuy, held at her death a property in Beachampstead, where there was a messuage burnt and devastated, lands and rents held of the king in chief as of the honour of Huntingdon, a croft called Greggiscroft held of John Dengayne, and 6 acres held of Edmund de Creting. Her heir, John son of William de Beaufuy, was of full age, but since her death the issues had been received by Sir Roland Daneys, kt., by grant of the king. (fn. 202)

In 1316 Dillington and Beachampstead were held as one vill by John Dengayne and Peter de Croft. (fn. 203) In the same year Peter de Croft was returned as holding a quarter of a fee in Beachampstead, claimed by Richard de Waleys and Eleanor his wife, formerly the wife of Robert de Brus, as part of the dower of Eleanor in the forfeited estates of Robert. (fn. 204) A Hugh Croft was dealing with land in Beachampstead in 1341–2. (fn. 205)

A manor or manors of BEAUFOES or BEUFITZ and CROFTS in Beachampstead was held in 1377 by Nicholas Stukeley, (fn. 206) and descended with the Stukeleys' manor of Great Stukeley (q.v.) to Laurence Torkington, (fn. 207) who with William Sterne and his wife Bridget in 1561 conveyed the manors to Sir James Dyer, kt., (fn. 208) already holding with his Rectory Manor, the hall, yard and house in the same, held of the manor of Beachampstead. (fn. 209) Sir Richard Dyer, grandnephew and heir of Sir James, granted an annuity in 1603 to his third son, Richard, out of his manor of Beachampstead, (fn. 210) described at his death in 1605 as the manor of 'Croftes alias Beaufittes alias Beachampstead.' (fn. 211) From his son William, who then inherited it, and who dealt with it as the manor of Beachampstead in 1609, (fn. 212) it passed to his son Sir Lodovick, who dealt with it in 1628. (fn. 213) In 1653 it was conveyed by Sir Lodovick Dyer, Richard Dyer, Katherine Dyer, widow, and Doyley Dyer to Sir Edward Coke, bart. (fn. 214) Sir Edward Coke, the youngest son of the celebrated Lord Chief Justice, married Katherine, sister and heir of Sir Lodovick Dyer, whose only child Henry had died in 1637. Sir Edward died in 1669. His son, Sir Robert, died without issue in 1687, as did the latter's brother and heir, Sir Edward, in 1727, all being buried at Langford (co. Derby). (fn. 215) Before this date, however, the manor had passed from the Cokes and was in 1717 held by John Howe, (fn. 216) the son, it is thought, of the eminent physician, Dr. George Howe, and of Letitia Foley. (fn. 217) John Howe was dead in 1729, and left only female issue. (fn. 218) Sophia, his daughter, married Christopher Walter, and in 1740 they conveyed the manor to Charles Clarke and Robert Palmer with warranty against the heirs of Sophia. (fn. 219) Arthur Walter in 1753 was dealing with it with Mary Walter, widow, (fn. 220) and his nephew was lord of the manor at the passing of the Inclosure Act in 1806. He died in 1821. (fn. 221) In 1822 Sophia Walter, Giles Smith and Anna Maria Eloisa his wife, James Stokes and Sophia Howe his wife, Richard Walter and Mary his wife, Arthur Walter and Adele Adelaide his wife, Christopher Walter, John Parr Walter, William Walter and Charles Walter (fn. 222) sold the manor which has now been held for some generations by the Duberlys with Gaynes.

Lymage Farm, in the north-west of the parish, appears to represent a manor of LIMINGE (Lymynge xiii cent.) which was granted by King John with the manors of Alconbury and Old Weston to Earl David of Scotland, (fn. 223) and descended with Brampton, Alconbury (q.v.) and other demesne manors of the honour of Huntingdon until the 16th century. John de Hastings in 1302 received a grant of free warren in Brampton and Liminge, (fn. 224) and in 1317 he obtained licence to grant Limage manor, as a member of his manor of Brampton, and held in chief, to William de Brom and Ascelina his wife, and John, son of the said William, for their lives. (fn. 225) It was held for life by John Waldegrave le Fitz, at whose death in 1349 it reverted to the Hastings family. During the minority of John, son of Laurence Hastings, the manor was in the wardship of Sir John Dengayne, kt. (fn. 226) Thomas, son and heir of John Dengayne of Dillington, was in 1359 pardoned the damage done by his father to houses and trees belonging to the manor of Limage while it was in his wardship. (fn. 227) The custody of the manor was in 1363 given to the King's clerk, John de Ditton, and in 1375 was granted as dower to Anne, widow of John de Hastings. (fn. 228) In 1543 Thomas Grey, who had succeeded to the manor from the Hastings, and Anne his wife conveyed it with tenements in Kimbolton and Stonley to Robert Burgoyne of London. (fn. 229)

It continued to be held by the Burgoynes, and was in 1651 allotted in moieties by an indenture of partition between Peter Burgoyne of the city of Coventry, Sir John Burgoyne of Sutton, co. Bed., bart., and Edward Cater of Kempstone, co. Bed. (1st part), and Jonathan Andrewes of the city of London, merchant (2nd part). (fn. 230) In 1655 the manor (or a moiety) was sold by Sir John Burgoyne, Edward Cater, Henry Porter of Parkwood (co. Warwick), and Robert Burgoyne of Sutton, son and heir of the above Peter Burgoyne, to Christopher Mercer, of the town of Cambridge, (fn. 231) after whose death it was conveyed, in 1673, to Francis Jaggard, citizen and grocer of London, by John Swale and his wife Ann, only surviving daughter of Christopher Mercer. (fn. 232) Francis Jaggard (d. 1680) bequeathed the moiety bought by him to John Jaggard, his brother and executor, citizen and merchant tailor of London, by whom and by Elizabeth, wife of the said John Jaggard, it was sold in 1682 to William Ingram, citizen and tallow-chandler of London, with fishings, franchises, courts, etc., appurtenant to the same in Limage, (fn. 233) as the manor of Lymage. In 1701 William Ingram and his wife Susan conveyed a moiety of the manor to William Welby. (fn. 234) The manor was being dealt with in 1734 by William Welby, (fn. 235) presumably his nephew and heir, who died in 1792 and whose only son, Sir William Earle Welby, was created a baronet in 1801 as of Denton, and died in 1815. His son, Sir William Earle Welby, 2nd bart., who succeeded him in the baronetcy and survived until 1852, appears to have bestowed the manor in his lifetime on his son and successor, Glynne Earle Welby, who was dealing with the manor of Lymage in 1827, (fn. 236) and succeeded him in the baronetcy in 1852. He assumed in 1875, the year of his death, the additional name of Gregory, now borne by his son Sir William Earle Welby-Gregory, 4th bart. (fn. 237)

Burgoyne. Gules a cheveron or between three talbots argent and a battled chief argent with three martlets azure therein.

Welby. Sable a fesse between three fleur de lis argent.

The hamlet of AGDEN GREEN (Akeden', xiii cent.) probably represents one of the three berewicks returned in the Domesday Survey as held by the Confessor with Paxton. (fn. 238) The de la Hays held with their lands in Beachampstead (where its history has been given) a wood in Agden where rights of estover, etc., were in 1240–1 and 1248–9 held by Reginald, parson of Paxton. The Aungevins held lands at Agden and at Beachampstead, and William Aungevin, who in 1279 owned half the site of the mill at Beachampstead, had granted 6 acres of land to the Priory of Stonley. (fn. 239) With lands held by the priory at its dissolution and granted with the priory to Oliver Leader and his wife Frances in 1544, were included messuages in Great Staughton, common of pasture in Agden, and Agden mills. (fn. 240) In 1552 tofts, a windmill, lands, etc., in Agden Green were granted with the site of the late priory and appurtenances in Great Staughton, Kimbolton, and Stonley by Oliver Leader and his wife Frances to Thomas Mary Wingfield, and his wife Margaret. (fn. 241) Tenements in Great Staughton were conveyed by Sir James Wingfield, kt., and his wife Margaret to Sir Henry Montagu, kt., Sergeant-at-law in 1615, (fn. 242) and to him again as Henry Earl of Manchester, in 1633. (fn. 243)

A windmill in Great Staughton was in 1598 conveyed to John Baldwin by Edward, Thomas and Oliver Woodley. (fn. 244)

The manor of BLAYSWORTH was apparently held of the chief manor of Great Staughton (q.v.) by the Daneys family and may have been brought to them like Offord Darcy (q.v.) through the marriage of William le Daneys with Emma, daughter of Robert de Offord. In 1241 a knight's fee in Blaysworth was conveyed by John le Daneys to William le Daneys his brother. (fn. 245) The manor was apparently reconveyed to John, as free warren in their demesne lands in Blaysworth was in 1254 granted at the instance of Nicholas de Boleville to William de Boleville and Ella his wife who was daughter and coheir of John le Daneys, (fn. 246) In 1261 William le Daneys, grandson of Richard. brother of the above mentioned William le Daneys, sued Richard Pauncefot and Isabella his wife, the younger William's cousin, for 2 carucates of land (fn. 247) in Blaysworth which he claimed as heir of Ella. William lost his suit owing to a technical error in his description in the pleadings. Isabella retained possession and granted the manor in her widowhood about 1270 to the Priory of Bushmead (co. Bed.), and a little later Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice Crioll, as ladies of the manor of Great Staughton in consideration of the affection of their mother Maud de Crioll to the priory, where she was buried, and for the health of the souls of their mother, of themselves and of Roger de Rollinges, released to the canons all reliefs and suits. (fn. 248) Isabella's grant was disputed in 1286 by Brice le Daneys, who claimed the lands as heir of Ella le Daneys, who married William de Boleville and died without heir of her body. He pleaded that on the death of Ella the fee went to Richard le Daneys, her uncle, brother of John, Ella's father; from Richard it descended to William his son, then to his son William, and so to Brice, son of the latter William. The prior contended that others besides Ella held the lands and amongst them was Isabella (Pauncefot), daughter of Maud, who was Ella's kinswoman and heir. The record of the case is unfinished. (fn. 249) The priory was holding the manor of Adam de Creting in 1279 (fn. 250) and, at the Dissolution, held in Blaysworth in the parish of Great Staughton a rent of 40s. (fn. 251) In 1537 all the lands in Blaysworth formerly held by the Prior of Bushmead were granted to Sir William Gascoigne and Elizabeth his wife (fn. 252) and in 1545 licence to alienate them together with the site of the priory, to Anthony Cokett of London was given to Sir John Gascoigne of Cardington (co. Bed.), son and heir of Sir William. (fn. 253) Blaysworth seems to have passed with the site of the priory in 1562 to William Gery, (fn. 254) who died seised of lands in Great Staughton in 1592, (fn. 255) leaving a son William who died in 1596. His son Richard died in 1638, leaving a son William. William married Anne daughter of Sir William Dyer of Great Staughton in 1633, when these lands formed part of the marriage settlement. (fn. 256) He suffered heavily on behalf of the royalist cause and died before the Restoration. His son William retired abroad complaining that he had been 'plundered to his shirt.' The existence of this property as a manor is lost sight of from this time, but the lands apparently remained in the possession of the Gery family and their descendants the Wade Gerys. (fn. 257)

Gery. Gules two bars argent each charged with three voided lozenges gules and a quarter or with a leopard's head azure therein.

Mention of the Moor occurs in accounts of tenants of the Cretings' manor, some of whom were also tenants of the Priory of Huntingdon in 1279.

At this date Geoffrey, son of Everard de Staughton, (fn. 258) held half a knight's fee in Great Staughton of Anselm de Gyse by homage and foreign service: he had in demesne 120 acres of arable land and a messuage, garden, etc.; his free tenants included William Scohisfot, who held a messuage and common rights in the pasture called the More. This hamlet of the Moor belongs now chiefly to Mr. Richard Wade-Gery.

CHURCH

The Church of ST. ANDREW consists of a chancel (36 ft. by 16 ft.) with north vestry (14 ft. by 10½ ft.), north chapel (15 ft. by 12¾ ft.), nave (58½ ft. by 20 ft.), north aisle (10½ ft. wide), south aisle (13¾ ft. wide), west tower (14¾ ft. by 14¾ ft.) and south porch. The walls are of stone and pebble rubble except the tower, which is of coursed rubble, and stone dressings. The roofs are covered with lead, tiles and slates.

GREAT STAUGHTON. PARISH CHURCH OF ST ANDREW
Reproduced by permission of the Controller of H.M. Stationery Office from the Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, Hunts.

The church is mentioned in the Domesday Survey (1086), but nothing of this early date remains in situ. At the end of the 13th century a gradual rebuilding was commenced by piercing three arches in each side wall of the nave, and this was quickly followed by an extension of the arcades by two western bays, the building of the aisles and rebuilding of the chancel. In the 14th century the south aisle was rebuilt and widened and a porch added, and the north aisle was partly rebuilt. In the latter half of the 15th century a considerable reconstruction took place; the nave arcades were rebuilt, using much of the old materials, a rood staircase formed and a clearstory added, the chancel arch and the east wall of the chancel being rebuilt. Somewhat later, a chapel known as the Gaynes chapel was erected on the north side of the chancel and the west tower was built. The vestry was built in 1526. In 1636 the church was said to be 'much ruinated' and a large sum was spent in repairs. (fn. 259) Considerable repairs were effected in 1848–50, and a complete restoration took place in 1866.

The late 13th-century chancel has a late 15th-century five-light window in the east wall. In the north wall one original lancet window remains, an early 15th-century window has been cut down to the floor and converted at some uncertain date into an opening to the north chapel, (fn. 260) and an early 16th-century doorway opens into the vestry. The south wall has an early 15th-century square-headed three-light window partly blocked by a 17th-century monument, a two-light window of c. 1300, another of c. 1340 forming a low-side window, and an original doorway. The late 15th-century chancel arch is two centred, of two chamfered orders, the lower resting on semi-circular shafts with moulded capitals and bases; the gable above has a sanctus-bell cot, which still retains its bell. The walls have lost their parapets, and the roof is modern and very flat, but two 15th-century tie-beams remain.

The north vestry has a modern two-light window in the east wall. The words 'Aō. Dō. 1526 E. Nel.' have been boldly cut on the north parapet. The contemporary roof has cambered tie-beams.

The north chapel, probably built about 1455, has a blocked three-light east window; on the north side is a shallow bay having a three-light window in its north wall and very small square-headed lights at the sides, and arched over with a panelled vault having three bosses carved with shields, (fn. 261) viz.: (1) in the centre, [Argent] on a cross [Sable] six escallops [Or] (Stonham), impaling [Argent] a horse-barnacle [Sable] (Barnack); (2) [Gules] a fesse dancette between seven crosses croslet [Or] (Engaine), impaling [Argent] two pales [Sable] (should be paly, for Burgatt); (3) [Argent] a cross engrailed [Vert] (Noon), impaling [Argent] three boars' heads couped [Gules] (Swinford). On the south is the altered window of the chancel, previously mentioned, and on the west is a modern arch to the aisle.

The 15th-century nave has an arcade of five bays on each side, having two centred arches of two chamfered orders resting on circular columns with moulded capitals and bases. The two eastern bays on each side are narrower than the others and perhaps indicate an earlier nave of only three bays, increased to five bays in the 13th century; but the whole was rebuilt (with the exception of the three western bays on the south) in the 15th century, when much of the old materials was used. The 15th-century rood-stairs remain in the south-east corner, both doorways being intact, and the contemporary clearstory has five two-light windows on each side. The modern roof is of hammer-beam type, (fn. 262) and the jack-legs stand on 15th-century carved stone corbels. The parapets are embattled, and the east gable has a sanctus-bell cot and bell.

The 14th-century north aisle has three 15th-century two-light windows and a doorway of c. 1300 in the north wall, and a 15th-century three-light window in the west wall. The roof is modern.

The mid-14th-century south aisle has an original three-light window with reticulated tracery in the east wall; in the south wall are three similar two-light windows, and a contemporary doorway with moulded arch resting on jambs having two engaged shafts with carved caps; the door itself has a 16th-century ornamental iron lock-plate. The west wall has a three-light window like that at the east end. The roof is modern.

The early 16th-century west tower (fn. 263) has a two-centred tower-arch of three moulded orders resting on attached shafts with moulded capitals and bases. The west doorway has a two-centred arch in a square head with traceried spandrils; above it is a four-light window. The next stage has a blocked recess on the west front, a two-light window on the south and a small opening above the roof on the east. The belfry windows are coupled two-lights with transoms. There is a broad plinth enriched with a band of quatrefoils: the buttresses stand square at the angles and rise to the sills of the belfry windows, at which point the walls are recessed and above the windows is a band of cusped lozenges; the whole being finished with an embattled parapet having crocketed pinnacles at the angles.

The mid-14th-century south porch has a two-centred arch with continuous mouldings in the south wall, and a modern two-light in each of the side walls. The porch has a mean slated roof and has been much mutilated and modernised.

The 13th-century font is a plain octagon; the upper part appears to be only roughly worked. It bears faint traces of red and black paint. It stands on a central and four smaller shafts, all modern. (fn. 264)

There are six bells, inscribed (1) '✠ To the Glory of God and in memory of those from this Parish who gave their lives in the Great War, 1919. J. W. Wragg, Vicar, C. W. Pearson, R. Ekins, Churchwardens.' (2) 'I H S. Nazarenvs Rex Ivdeorvm fili Dei miserere mei, 1633.' (3) 'Edmond Ibbott, Raphe Paine, C. 1633.' (4) 'Hac in conclaue Gabriel nunc pange suaue.' (5) 'John Appleby, Vicar, Edwd. S . . . A . . . (fn. 265) & John Rose, Churchwardens. Robt. Taylor, St. Neots, fecit, 1787.' (6) 'George Wauton Esquier, 1600. George (fn. 266) Walkre, Minister, George Darter, Willim Glover, Churchwardens.' A sanctus bell (blank) hanging in its cote and roped. In 1552 there were four bells and a sanctus bell. (fn. 267) In 1711 there were five large bells and the sanctus bell. (fn. 268) The bells were quarter-turned in 1901, and again rehung and a new treble added by Messrs. John Warner and Sons, in 1926.

At the west end of the nave is an oak screen formed of materials of two periods: the upper part being the back of a seat, inscribed 'Of your Charyte Pray For The Good Astate Of Olyver Leder and frances hys Wyfe, Anno dñi. 1539'; the lower, parts of the 17th-century pulpit. They were put together in their present form in 1903.

The chancel has a dado of 17th-century panelling, and the contemporary altar-rails have turned and twisted balusters.

The indents of four brasses remain in the chancel (1) An inscription plate and two shields, probably early 15th century; (2) covered by the seats, but the indent of a shield is visible; (3) a civilian and wife with children, two inscription plates, &c., early 16th century; (4) almost worn away.

There are several ancient stones lying loose in the church, including a corbel carved with a demi-angel holding a chalice, 15th century; and in the north chapel is an early 17th-century funeral helm and a pair of gauntlets, lying upon the Beverley monument.

In the chancel is a large double monument to Sir James Deyer, kt., d. 1582, and Margaret (Barrowe) his wife, d. 1560, and Sir Richard Deyer, kt., his great-nephew, d. 1605, and Marie (Fitzwilliam) his wife, d. 1601. The monument is of two bays with Corinthian columns supporting a cornice surmounted by obelisks and Elizabethan strap-work inclosing two shields of arms; in each half are kneeling figures of husband and wife facing each other under a double arch; the monument is carried by a heavy bracketed corbel enriched with shields of arms; and the whole is painted in colours; the eastern half was made by Sir Richard and the western half by his son.

In the north chapel a table-tomb to Sir James Beverley, kt., d. 1670, has a moulded top, panelled sides, and a shield of arms at each end.

At the east end of the south aisle is a monument to Sir George Wauton, eques auratus, d. 1606. The recumbent effigy rests on a stout stone shelf supported by two figures in Roman costume; behind the effigy is a shield of arms in a circular medallion flanked by double pilasters and with a shaped cornice over all.

There are other monuments: in the chancel, to Sarah, wife of John Spencer, and Sarah their daughter, d. 1632; Christopher and Mary, infant children of John Conyers, d. 1679; Sir John Conyers, bart, d. 1719, and Mary [Newman] his wife, d. 1714; Sir Baldwin Conyers, bart, d. 1731, John his son, d. 1729, and Margaret his wife, d. 1758; the Rev. Richard Walters, d. 1785, and Jane his wife, d. 1813; the Rev. James Pope, Vicar, d. 1822; the Rev. Thomas Clare, Vicar, d. 1830; General Denzil Onslow, d. 1838, Denzil his son, d. 1879, and Henry Cope, another son, d. 1870; the Rev. Henry Bristow Wilson, Vicar, d. 1888, and his father the Rev. Harry Bristow Wilson, d. 1853; William Stephen Watson, d. 1900; John Reynolds Pickersgill-Cunliffe, d. 1914; Harry Pickersgill-Cunliffe, d. 1919; and Harry Hardwick, d. 1927; floor slabs to John Baldwin, d. 1657; Anna wife of John Baldwin, d. 1663; Robert Baldwin, d. 1678, and Mary, daughter of John Conyers, d. 1678; Christopher William, son of Baldwin Conyers, d. 1703; Edward, 5th son of Sir John and Mary Conyers, d. 1705, and Ann Ward, daughter of Jane Ward, d. 1665; and glass windows to Frances Cox Robotham, erected 1900; and Emma Murfine, d. 1907.

In the north chapel, to Sir James Beverley, kt., d. 1670; Major General Thomas Handasyd, d. 1729, General Roger Handasyd, d. 1763, and Mrs. Ann Proby, sister of Roger, d. 1777; Sir James Duberly, kt., d. 1832, and his daughters Caroline, d. 1812, and Emily, d. 1819; Etheldred (St. Barbe), widow of Sir James Duberly, d. 1859; Cecil Vesey Duberly, d. 1878, Louisa, Lady Sandys, d. 1886, and William Duberly, d. 1888; Emily Hannah (Grey), widow of James Duberly, d. 1883; Charles Conrad Grey Duberly, d. 1893; Grey William Duberly, d. 1915; and glass windows to James Duberly, d. 1864, and Frederic James his son, d. 1851.

In the nave, War Memorial, 1914–19.

In the north aisle, to Lieut.-Col. Henry Duberly, d. 1890; Robert Moulton, d. 1895; South African War Memorial, 1899–1902; Martha Embleton, d. 1912; James Duberly, d. 1912; Grey William Duberly, d. 1915; Vernon Conrad Duberly, d. 1916.

In the south aisle, to the wife of James Nicholson, d. 1783; the Rev. John Negus, Vicar, d. 1785, and his wife, d. 1784; Margaret wife of John Byrn, d. 1794; and glass windows to the Rev. James Pope, Vicar, d. 1822; Elizabeth wife of Thomas Henry Murfin, d. 1872; and William Stephen Watson, d. 1900.

In the tower glass window to Thomas Henry Murfin, d. 1885.

The registers are as follows: (i) Baptisms, marriages and burials, 28 March 1540 to 22 Oct. 1652; (ii) the same, 17 Dec. 1653 to 24 July 1701; (iii) the same, 27 Sept. 1702 to — Oct. 1747; marriages end 24 July 1726; (iv) the same, 12 Feb. 1747 to 27 Dec. 1801; marriages end 24 Dec. 1759; (v) baptisms and burials, 4 Jan. 1802 to 29 Dec. 1812; (vi) the official marriage book, 7 June 1754 to 9 March 1804; (vii) the same, 29 March 1804 to 16 Nov. 1812.

The church plate consists of a large silver cup inscribed 'M. S. Carissimae suae conjugis Sophiae, Quae obiit 1 mo. Feb. Anno Dom. 1750, Ætat. 31, et sepulta jacet in hoc Templo, Dono Dedit C. Walter' and with coat of arms, Azure a fesse dancette between three eagles displayed Or; on a shield of pretence quarterly 1 and 4, Argent a fesse between three lions' heads rased gules, 2 and 3, Or, on a fesse gules three - - - for Christopher Walter and his wife Sophia, dau. of Col. John Howe, by his wife . . . dau. of White Kennett, Bishop of Peterborough, hall-marked for 1751–2; a silver standing paten with same inscription, arms and hall-mark, and inscribed 'Staughton Magna' on back; a silver alms dish as last; a silver chalice, inscribed 'Presented to St. Andrew's Church, Great Staughton, by the Members of Mrs. Gibson's Working Guild, 1894' hall-marked for 1886–7; a silver standing paten hall-marked for 1909–10; a plated chalice with no inscription.

ADVOWSON

The Domesday Survey (1086) mentions a priest and a church in the Bishop of Lincoln's manor, (fn. 269) and the church was in 1178 confirmed by Pope Alexander III to the Abbey of Ramsey, (fn. 270) whose protest against the bishop's tenure of this manor was recorded in the Survey. There is also mention in the Survey of a church in Perry that was represented in 1492 by the chapel of Perry to which Walter Brey then made a bequest. (fn. 271) Although the tenants of Eustace the sheriff, under-tenant of the bishop in 1086, are not found in the bishop's manor, they appear for a time to have retained rights in the church, as in 1238 when Vitalis Engayne was licensed to have a chapel (fn. 272) in the court of his manor house at Dillington within the parish of Staughton church, the consent of Sir Geoffrey de Mandevill, kt., the patron of Great Staughton, as well as that of Ralph, rector there, had first been obtained. (fn. 273) By 1279 the advowson was held with the manor, and Anselm de Gyse was patron. (fn. 274) With the manor it was held after Anselm again by Adam de Creting and his successors, and frequent grants of it were made by them with 2 acres of land in the manor appurtenant to it. After the death of John de Creting disputes resulted from grants made by his widow Hawise (remarried to Geoffrey de Drayton) with her dower third of that manor (q.v.). The advowson was claimed in 1363 by Laurence de Pabenham as nephew and heir of John de Offord, but his claim was disputed on the ground that John de Offord had held only under a grant made by Hawise, then already dead, and that the advowson was appurtenant to the manor of Edmund de Creting, of whose inheritance she had held it. (fn. 275) The church was valued in 1291 at £26 13s. 4d. (fn. 276) The foundation of the Charterhouse (1371) (fn. 277) was followed by efforts on the part of the prior to secure the right of advowson from the king. (fn. 278) In 1377 Richard II acquired 2 acres of land in Great Staughton and the advowson of the church from Thomas de Wells (of co. Norfolk), (fn. 279) and in 1381 granted the same to the prior and convent of the Charterhouse. (fn. 280) This appropriation was confirmed by the pope, but on the ground that it had been obtained by false suggestion on the part of Charterhouse, efforts were made to oust the priory, which in 1393 had obtained a decree in Chancery confirming its rights, (fn. 281) which were again confirmed to it in 1394. In 1419 a dispute between the perpetual vicar and the priory of Charterhouse was terminated by a release to the priory of all personal actions. (fn. 282) The rectory, appropriated to the Charterhouse, was valued at the Dissolution at £38 yearly and the vicarage at £20, (fn. 283) and the advowson was granted with the rectory as part of the possessions of Charterhouse to Oliver Leader in 1539, its subsequent history being given in that of the rectory manor (q.v.) (fn. 284)

Tithes in Perry in Great Staughton were in 1771 conveyed by George Elliott and others to Robert Godley senior; (fn. 285) and tithes in Great Staughton by William Henry Chauncey and others to Henry Galley in 1775; (fn. 286) and by John Hughes and his wife Sarah to Bernard Baldwin in 1787. (fn. 287)

CHARITIES

The following charities constitute the Great Staughton parish charities and are regulated by a scheme of the Charity Commissioners dated 23 May 1865:—

The Town Field Charity consists of an allotment of 24 a. 3 r. 37 pls. allotted on the inclosure of the parish in or about 1808 to the minister and churchwardens, the rents to be applied to the poor in bread.

The Poor's Estate consists of certain pieces of land at Agden Green in the parish containing 3 a. 1 r. 3 pls., allotted on the above-mentioned inclosure to the minister and churchwardens and 4 cottages at Agden Green, the rents to be applied in bread to the poor.

The Rectory Dole. The endowment of this charity consists of a rentcharge of the value of 4 bushels of wheat and 10 bushels of barley secured upon an estate in the parish which was allotted in lieu of the rectorial tithes. The value thereof is distributed to the poor in bread.

Shudbolt's Gift. Edward Shudbolt, in or about 1806, gave £20 to the minister and churchwardens the interest to be distributed among poor widows.

Rachael Johnson's Charity consists of an annuity or annual sum of 18s. payable out of the net income of the Poor's Estate aforesaid.

The Church Lands Charity consists of a piece of land in the moors in the parish containing 1 r. 22 pls. and a piece of land in Agden Green aforesaid containing 1 r. 2 pls. allotted on the aforesaid inclosure to the minister and churchwardens.

The Bell Rope Charity. Certain pieces of land situate in the Town Field at Great Staughton containing 2 a. 1 r. 13 pls. were allotted upon the aforesaid inclosure to the minister and churchwardens.

By an order of the Charity Commissioners dated 25 February 1896 the Church Land Charity and the Bell Rope Charity were separated from the rest of the Great Staughton parish charities and called the Great Staughton Ecclesiastical Charity. The income of the charity, amounting to about £4 per annum in rent, is carried to the churchwardens' account and applied towards church expenses and repairs to the bellropes.

By a further order of the said Commissioners dated 31 May 1907, the whole of the endowment of the Great Staughton parish charities—except the annual sums referred to in clause 8 of the scheme of 23 May 1865, and amounting in the aggregate to £34 7s.—were determined educational and form the endowment of the Great Staughton Educational Foundation.

The above-mentioned sum of £34 7s. is distributed by the vicar and churchwardens in bread to the poor and doles to widows in accordance with the provisions contained in the above-mentioned scheme.

Mrs. Sophia Ann Pope, by will proved in the Principal Registry 22 December 1920, gave to the vicar and churchwardens of St. Andrew's Church the sum of £2,800 upon trust (1) as to £2,300 thereof to be applied in providing and maintaining a nurse whose services shall be available among and for the benefit of the parishioners of Great Staughton, and (2) as to the remaining £500 to maintain in good order the Burial Ground in the parish.

The above-mentioned legacies are now represented by sums of (1) £3,080 8s. 5d. and (2) £669 13s. 2d. India 3 per cent. Stock held by the Official Trustees and producing (1) £92 8s. 4d. and (2) £20 1s. 8d. yearly in dividends which are applied in accordance with the directions contained in the will of the donor.

Emma Dinah Murfin, by will proved in the Principal Registry 20 March 1907, gave to the vicar and churchwardens (1) a sum of £2,000 the income to be distributed to the poor in coals, blankets and bread, and (2) a sum of £200 for keeping in repair and good condition the organ of the parish church. The above-mentioned legacies are now represented by (1) £1,483 14s. 8d. India 3 per cent. Stock and £472 L.M. & S. Rly. 4 per cent. Pref. Stock (1923) held by the Official Trustees producing a total income of £63 7s. 8d. yearly in dividends which are distributed to the poor in coals, and (2) £189 L.M. & S. Rly. 4 per cent. Pref. Stock (1923) held by the Official Trustees producing £7 11s. 2d. yearly in dividends which are applied towards the upkeep of the organ.

Duberly Memorial Fund. The endowment of this charity, founded by declaration of trust dated 2 May 1918, consists of £400 2½ per cent. Consols held by the Official Trustees. The income amounting to £10 annually in dividends is applied by the vicar and churchwardens in gifts of £1 every Christmas to each of the deserving and necessitous poor persons resident in the ecclesiastical parish of St. Andrew, Great Staughton.

Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton Knight of Malta and Templar of England
born in Italy, the 27th of April 1976, studied in Switzerland where he got the Master Degree into Engineering of Computer Science via University of Geneva. President CEO of a Big Oil Trading Company made in MALTA with an operative head quarters in Geneva (Switzerland), named MCC Petroli Company - www.mccpetroli.com
Has been appointed by forbes as the younger Oil Busines Man for the Europe!
He is also known to be one of the most rich and famous man into the world, classifying himself between the first 1000+ most reach peoples of the world.
Footnotes

1   Wills, Archd. Hunt. Reg. vii, fol. 195.
2   There are many bequests towards the repair of Wrong Bridge in 1504, 1509, 1544; ibid. ii, 75, 109; vii, 141. There is also mention of Colby Street in 1489 (ibid. i, 48).
3   Will giving bequests to Wrong Bridge and Staughton (Stoketon) Bridge (ibid. ii, 109).
4   Cambs. and Hunts. Arch. Soc. Trans. iii, 39.
5   For authorities regarding Place House see below, Rectory Manor.
6   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 292–4.
7   See under account of the manor.
8   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 306.
9   See below the account of Dillington Manor.
10   Ibid.
11   See below under the account of Beachampstead Manor.
12   Kemble, Cod. Dipl. Æv. Sax. no. 967.
13   Ibid. no. 581; Chron. Abb. Rames. (Rolls Ser.) 199; Cartul. Mon. de Rames. (Rolls Ser.) iii, 167.
14   Ibid. ii, 56.
15   Ibid. 70, 73.
16   Ibid. 94.
17   Ibid. 136.
18   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 341.
19   Cal. Inq. iii, no. 492.
20   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cccxxxvii, 112.
21   Red Bk. of Excheq. (Rolls Ser.) 376. From the Domesday Monachorum printed in V.C.H. Kent, iii, we get the following pedigree: William son of Ralph (c. 1150) had a son William de Eynesford who was succeeded by another William.
22   Add. Ch. 33595.
23   V.C.H. Bucks. ii, 361.
24   Abbrev. Plac. (Rec. Com.) 1.
25   Pipe R. 5 John (Camb. and Hunts.).
26   Cal. Close, 1227–31, p. 564.
27   Cal. Inq. Misc. i, 219.
28   Cal. Close, 1272–9, p. 23.
29   Inq. p.m. Edw. I, file 7, no. 10.
30   Dugdale, Mon. Angl. vi, 283.
31   Complete Peerage (New Ed.) iii, 542.
32   Ibid. 532.
33   Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec. Com.) 30; Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 666, 680–1.
34   Cal. Inq. Hen. III, no. 389.
35   Farrer, Honors and Knights' Fees, iii, 162.
36   Cal. Chart. 1257–1300, p. 175.
37   Cal. Chart. 1257–1300, p. 175.
38   Cal. Close, 1272–9, p. 92.
39   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 680–682.
40   It was probably this lady of the manor who on her death-bed left the monks of St. Neots a virgate of land in Staughton together with her body to be buried in their church. The bequest was disputed by the heirs (Assize R. 348, m. 8).
41   Ibid. m. 7d.
42   Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec. Com.) 304.
43   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) pp. 40, 41, 43, 44.
44   Chan. Inq. p.m. 24 Edw. I, no. 47.
45   Cal. Fine R. 1272–1307, p. 369.
46   Cal. Inq. iii, no. 492; Chan. Inq. p.m. 27 Edw. I, no. 25. These inquisitions mention a chief messuage, 2 dovecots, windmill, pasture called la More, etc.
47   Feud. Aids, ii, 473.
48   Index to Plac. de Banco 1327–8, i, p. 222; Abbrev. Plac. (Rec. Com.) 355.
49   Cal. Chart. 1327–41, p. 168.
50   See De Banco R. 354, m. 1d.
51   Cal. Pat. 1334–8, p. 531.
52   De Banco R. 354, m. 1d.
53   De Banco R. Hil. 43 Edw. III. The Wautons, however, claimed to be heirs general to the Cretings and quartered their arms. S.I.L.
54   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 87. It recorded Geoffrey de Drayton's tenure.
55   Ibid. 92.
56   Ibid. 93.
57   Ibid. 98.
58   Ibid. 87.
59   Ibid. 98.
60   Dict. Nat. Biog.; Visit. Beds. (Harl. Soc.) 198.
61   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) xvi, 99.
62   Star Chamber Proc. Hen. VIII, bdle. 32, no. 84.
63   Visit. of Beds. loc. cit.
64   Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 33 Hen. VIII.
65   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cv, 82.
66   Feet of F. Hunts. East. 5 Eliz.
67   Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 191, no. 80.
68   Add. Ch. 39324. In 1582 Thomas Beverley of Great Staughton made a lease of lands in Great Staughton to Thomas Pete, with use of the 'great barn of the manor' and stipulating concerning game conies (ibid. 39323, 39325).
69   Shaw, Knights of England, ii, 135.
70   Feet of F. Hunts. Hil. 3 Jas. I; Recov. R. Hil. 3 Jas. I, ro. 60; with 10 messuages, 3 mills, 1 dovecot, 300 a. land, 40 a. meadow, 200 a. pasture, 100 a. wood, 20s. rent, free fishery, free warren, view of frankpledge, etc.; Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cccxxxvii, 112.
71   Ibid.
72   The next heirs of Sir George were Frances Throgmorton, widow; Marcia, Elizabeth, and Grace, daughters of Elizabeth Swallow, deceased, daughter of Emma Roberts, deceased; and Thomas Jermayne, son of Jane Jermayne, deceased, late wife of William Jermayne; which Frances Throgmorton, Emma Roberts, and Jane Jermayne were sisters of Sir George Wauton.
73   Cal. S.P. Dom. 1623–5, p. 151.
74   Ibid. 187.
75   Ibid. p. 256.
76   Feet of F. Hunts. East. 1651.
77   Ibid. East. 1657.
78   Cal. S.P. Dom. 1660–1, pp. 407, 559, 560; Pat. R. 13 Chas. II, pt. 9.
79   Cal. S.P. Dom. 1660–1, p. 346.
80   Ibid. Gaule seems actually to have changed sides whenever his own interests were thereby furthered.
81   Ibid. 1661–2, pp. 276, 292.
82   Pat. R. 4 Jas. II, pt. 7, no. 1.
83   Ibid. 3 Will. & Mary, pt. 4, no. 4.
84   Ibid. 4 Anne, pt. 3, no. 17.
85   Feet of F. East. 23 Chas. II; 36 Chas. II.
86   Ibid. Mich. 36 Chas. II; with mills, free fishery, free warren, court baron, view of frankpledge and advowson (Recov. R. Mich. 36 Chas. II, ro. 203).
87   Com. Pl. Recov. R. Trin. 8 Geo. III, ro. 1. His will is dated 1691, but he appears to have lived for some years later.
88   Com. Pl. Recov. R. Trin. 8 Geo. III, ro. 1.
89   Ibid. East. 48 Geo. III, m. 130. The owners of the Rectory Manor seem to have continued to be lessees of the chief manor of Staughton and to have resided at Staughton House.
90   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 667, 680–2.
91   L. and P. Hen. VIII, xiv, (1) g. 1354 (58).
92   De Banco R. 354; East. 22 Edw. III, m. 1d.
93   Cal. Pat. 1401–5, p. 82.
94   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) xvi, 99; Cal. Inq. Hen. VII, ii, 647; will of Thomas Leader dated 1501: to be buried in Staughton church, Alice his wife, and sons Stephen and William (Wills, Archd. Hunt. Reg. ii, fol. 30).
95   Early Chan. Proc. bdle. 249, no. 58.
96   Close R. 35 Hen. VIII, pt. 3.
97   Court of Req. xiv, 136.
98   Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 188, no. 96.
99   Star Chamber Proc. Phil. & Mary, vi, 77.
100   Shaw, Knights of England, ii, 69.
101   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cxiii, 52.
102   Ibid.
103   Com. Pleas, D. Enr. Trin. 4 & 5 Phil. & Mary.
104   Op. cit. (2nd Ed.) i, fol. 1, p. 2.
105   Com. Pleas, D. Enr. loc. cit. He was the son of Richard Dyer, of Wincanton, co. Somerset, and enjoyed a high reputation for incorruptible integrity (D.N.B.).
106   D. Enr. loc. cit.; Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cxxvii, 10.
107   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 151.
108   Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 209, no. 54.
109   Church Inscriptions (R. Com. on Hist. Mons. Hunts.), p. 251.
110   Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 208, no. 23.
111   Ibid. bdle 209, no. 54.
112   Ibid.
113   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) ccxcii, 198. Henry Cromwell, eldest son of the royalist Sir Oliver Cromwell of Hinchin-brooke, married as his second wife Lucy, daughter of Sir Richard Dyer, of Great Staughton: Fam. Min. Gent. (Harl. Soc. xxxviii), p. 436, and the Dyers evidently continued to be closely identified with the local interests and life.
114   Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 306, no. 40.
115   Visit. Hunts. (Camden Soc.) 53.
116   G.E.C. Complete Baronetage, ii, 26.
117   Cal. of Com. for Comp. 907. His fine at one-tenth was £1,500.
118   G.E.C. Complete Baronetage, ii, 26. He had, however, left that county (V.C.H. Beds. iii, 187).
119   He made conveyances of land in Great Staughton in 1571 and 1576 (Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 164, 172), and was engaged in Chancery proceedings about land there (Chan. Proc. (Ser. ii) bdle. 38, no. 76).
120   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) cccxx, 67. Sir George Wauton included the advowson in dealing with his manor of Great Staughton in 1605, but it was an erroneous claim apparently.
121   Feet of F. Div. Cos. Mich. 19 Jas. I; Recov. R. Mich. 19 Jas. I, ro. 106.
122   Ibid. Trin. 7 Chas. I, ro. 102; Feet of F. Hunts. Trin. 7 Chas. I.
123   Cambs. and Hunts. Arch Soc. Trans. iii, 37.
124   Recov. R. Mich. 15 Chas. II, ro. 198. Robert was cousin of John and succeeded under John's will (P.C.C. Wotton, 157).
125   P.C.C. Reeve, 138; G.E.C. Complete Baronetage, ii, 46; Burke, Extinct Baronetage, 128.
126   Recov. R. Trin. 6 Geo. I, ro. 144.
127   Com. Pleas, Recov. R. East. 48 Geo. III, ro. 130.
128   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) xxxiii, 3.
129   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 344.
130   Cartul. Mon. de Rames. (Rolls Ser.) i, 128; ii, 259.
131   Ibid. i, 269; with woodland 1 league 2 quar. in length and 1 league in width.
132   Red Bk. of Excheq. (Rolls Ser.) ii, 531; Cartul. Mon. de Rames. (Rolls Ser.) iii, pp. vii, 49; Mellows, Pytchley's Bk. of Fees (Northants Rec. Soc.) 130, where there is a pedigree of the Engaynes; see also Round, Feudal England, 154–6; Wrottesley, Ped. from the Plea R. 478, 490; Complete Peerage, v, 72–3. According to Mellows, Sarah was daughter of the Earl of Oxford, but Wrottesley, Ped. from Plea R. p. 525, gives his wife as stated here.
133   Rot. Rob. Grosseteste (Cant. and York Soc.) 260–1.
134   Feet of F. Hunts. Hil. 25 Hen. III. The chapel of St. Mary was evidently that confirmed with Dillington to the Abbey by Pope Alexander in 1178.
135   Cartul. Mon. de Rames. (Rolls Ser.) i, 93; ii, 356; Feet of F. Hunts. case 92, file 8, no. 148.
136   Cal. Inq. Hen. III, no. 166.
137   Ibid. no. 809.
138   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) i, 198; ii, 666–7.
139   Cal. Inq. iii, 418; Chan. Inq. p.m. 25 Edw. I, no. 46. The extent of the manor enumerates a fish pool, dovecot and windmill.
140   Chart. R. 31 Edw. 1, no. 96, m. 1.
141   Cal. Pat. 1313–7, pp. 427, 501.
142   Feet of F. Div. Cos. Mich. 12 Edw. II; Mellows, Pytchley Bk. of Fees (Northants Rec. Soc.) 130 n.
143   Cal. Close, 1318–23, p. 626; Chan. Inq. p.m. 16 Edw. II, no. 71. In this inquisition a chief messuage is returned.
144   Cal. Close, 1339–41, p. 183. The manor had been settled on John and his heirs with remainder to Henry, another son of Nicholas (Cal. Inq. viii, 219).
145   Chan. Inq. p.m. 32 Edw. III, no. 27; Cal. Fine R. vii, 58, 84; Cal. Close, 1354–60, pp. 443–4.
146   Ibid. 1364–8, p. 411; Chan. Inq. p.m. 41 Edw. III, no. 25.
147   Feet of F. Div. Cos. Mich. 43 Edw. III.
148   Add Ch. 19979, 33137.
149   Feet of F. Div. Cos. Mich. 48 Edw. III.
150   Ibid. East. 50 Edw. III.
151   Chan. Inq. p.m. 2 Hen. IV, no. 15.
152   Ibid. 11 Hen. IV, no. 17.
153   Ibid. 9 Hen. V, no. 23.
154   Feet of F. Div. Cos. Mich. 6 Hen. VI.
155   Feud. Aids, ii, 477.
156   Visit. Hunts. (Camden Soc.) 51. Inscription in Great Staughton church recording the burial there of herself and her husband.
157   Add Ch. 33249.
158   Visit. of Beds. (Harl. Soc.) xix, 14.
159   Chan. Inq. p.m. 21 Edw. IV, no. 44; Exch. Inq. p.m. lxii, 18. Dorothy was probably the second wife (see Visit. Beds. loc. cit.)
160   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) xxxiii, 3; vi, 64.
161   L. and P. Hen. VIII, iv, (iii) 5624 g. (10).
162   Ibid. g. 6072 (21).
163   L. and P. Hen. VIII, ii, 4456, 4710, etc.
164   Ibid. v, g. 318 (21).
165   G.E.C. Peerage (Winchester).
166   Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 34 & 35 Eliz.
167   Ibid. Hil. 41 Eliz.
168   Ibid. Mich. 42 Eliz.; Recov. R. Hil. 42 Eliz. ro. 36.
169   Add. Ch. 39327.
170   Feet of F. Hunts. Trin. 5 Jas. I. A court roll of the court baron of Oliver Cromwell in his manors in Gaynes, Dillington and Perry for 1601 survives (Add. R. 39575).
171   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) ccccxc, 97; Feet of F, Div. Cos. Trin. 17 Jas. I.
172   D.N.B.
173   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) dlxxxix, 97.
174   Feet of F. Hunts. Trin. 10 Chas. I; Recov. R. Trin. 15 Chas. I, ro. 57.
175   Mr. Gall or Gaule is described as a ranter who, after being chaplain to Lord Camden, deserted the Royalist cause in hope of preferment, was appointed to Great Staughton through the influence of Valentine Wauton, and in 1660 wrote a tract inviting moderation in the hope of being allowed to retain his living at the Restoration (D.N.B.).
176   Recov. R. East. 1652, ro. 165.
177   Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 15 Chas. II; Recov. R. Mich. 15 Chas. II, ro. 198.
178   Close R. 16 Chas. II, pt. 10, no. 41.
179   Recov. R. Hil. 26 & 27 Chas. II, ro. 59.
180   Close R. 10 Wm. III, pt. 14, no. 9; Feet of F. Hunts. East. 10 Wm. III.
181   Cambs. and Hunts. Arch. Soc. Trans. iii, 41–2.
182   Recov. R. East. 9 Geo. III, ro. 350.
183   Com. Pleas, D. Enr. Trin. 26 Geo. III, ro. 180.
184   For the Cheshire family of Benington see V.C.H. Herts. iii, 75; Recov. R. Trin. 26 Geo. III, ro. 365. Henry Galley held a court of Gains, Dillington and Perry in 1791 (Norris MSS. 474).
185   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 666; Feet of F. Mich. 15 Chas. II.
186   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 350b.
187   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 7.
188   Cal. Inq. Hen. III, i, no. 809.
189   See Southoe.
190   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 674.
191   Cal. Inq. vi, no. 427. A messuage in le Estende in Perry, which Margaret widow of John Cuckowe released in 1469 to Robert Bolton (Anct. D. A.7884) was evidently in Grafham, 113 acres called East Perry, part of this hamlet, are entered in the Inclosure Act of 1807.
192   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 681.
193   Add. Ch. 11233–6. See also Farrer, Honors and Knights' Fees, ii, 403.
194   Pipe R. 6 Ric. I, m. 2d; 9 Ric. I, m. 6.
195   Curia Regis R. iii, 281–2. Lands in Suffolk of Julian, father of Maurice de la Haye.
196   Bracton's Note Book, 558.
197   Assize R. 341, m. 4.
198   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 18, 22.
199   Ibid. 36.
200   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 667.
201   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 40.
202   Chan. Inq. p.m. 31 Edw. III (1st nos.) no. 14.
203   Feud. Aids, ii, 472. Beachampstead is wrongly read here as Mythampstede.
204   Cal. Inq. Edw. II, v, 548, p. 360; Cal. Close, 1313–18, p. 522.
205   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 71.
206   Cal. Close, 1377–81, p. 120; Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 88.
207   Cal. Close, 1377–81, 112, 113, 114; Exch. Inq. p.m. lxii, 13; Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) xxx, 64; xlviii, 86; lxi, 77. It figured also in a proposal for an exchange of property between John Stukely and John Broughton the younger, which led to Chancery proceedings (E. Chan. Proc. bdle 53, no. 199).
208   Feet of F. Div. Cos. East. 3 Eliz.
209   Com. Pleas, Deeds Enr. Trin. 4 & 5 Phil. & Mary. A family of Dyer had been for some time resident in the parish. Edward Dyer by his will proved 1525 desired to be buried in the church 'in the high alie before the steple' (tower). He left his tenement called Bosyatts in Beachampstead to Edward Dyer when he should be 21 years of age. To his wife Agnes the tenement in which he lived called Saviges. Towards setting up of the church house 6s. 8d. (Wills, Archd. Hunts. Reg. ii, fol. 298).
210   Add. Ch. 39328; Recov. R. Trin. 1 Jas. I, ro. 20.
211   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) ccxcii, 198.
212   Feet of F. Div. Cos. East. 7 Jas. I.
213   Recov. R. Hil. 3 Chas. I, m. 2.
214   Feet of F. Hunts. Trin. 1653.
215   G.E.C. Baronetage, Coke.
216   Recov. R. Mich. 4 Geo. I, ro. 65.
217   Fam. Min. Gent. (Harl. Soc.) xxxviii, 443; D.N.B.; John, father of George Howe, was domestic chaplain both to Oliver Cromwell and his son Richard.
218   H. Roger, Life of John Howe. App. p. 330.
219   Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 14 Geo. II.
220   Recov. R. 26 & 27 Geo. II, ro. 197.
221   Moule, Topog. Dic. 1837.
222   Recov. R. Trin. 3 Geo. IV, ro. 224.
223   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 591.
224   Cal. Chart. 1300–26, p. 31.
225   Cal. Pat. 1313–17, 654.
226   Cal. Fine R. vi, 246; vii, 57.
227   Cal. Pat. 1358–61, p. 237.
228   Ibid. 1361–4, p. 346; 1374–77, p. 195.
229   Feet of F. Mich. 35 Hen. VIII.
230   Close R. 34 Chas. II, pt. 18, no. 31. Sir John Burgoyne was made a baronet in 1641 (G.E.C. Baronetage, ii, 104).
231   Close R. loc. cit.; Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 1655.
232   Ibid. Mich. 24 Chas. II; East. 25 Chas. II.
233   Ibid. Mich. 34 Chas. II; Close R. 34 Chas. II, pt. 18, no. 31.
234   Feet of F. Hunts. Mich. 12 Wm. III. This was probably William Welby of Denton (see Harl. Soc. Publ. lv), who died unmarried in 1704, recommended for the order of the Royal Oak.
235   Recov. R. Hil. 8 Geo. II, ro, 31.
236   Ibid. Trin. 8 Geo. IV, ro. 1212.
237   Fox Davies, Armorial Families; Burke, Peerage, etc., ed. 1927.
238   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 352.
239   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 668.
240   L. and P. Hen. VIII, xix, (ii) g. 340 (8).
241   Feet of F. Hunts. Hil. 6 Edw. VI.
242   Ibid. Mich. 13 Jas. I.
243   Ibid. Hil. 9 Chas. I.
244   Ibid. Mich. 40 & 41 Eliz.
245   Cal. Feet of F. Hunts. (Camb. Antiq. Soc.) 19.
246   Cal. Pat. 1247–58, p. 379.
247   Assize R. 343, m. 3d.
248   Dugdale, Mon. Angl. vi, 282–3.
249   Assize R. 343, m. 3d; 348, m. 6d.
250   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 680.
251   Valor Eccles. (Rec. Com.) iv, 200.
252   Pat. R. 29 Hen. VIII, pt. 1.
253   L. and P. Hen. VIII, vol. xx, (1) g. 621 (14).
254   See V.C.H. Beds. iii, 197–8.
255   Chan. Inq. p.m. (Ser. ii) ccxxxiii, 42.
256   Ibid. Misc. 14 Chas. I, pt. 28, no. 7.
257   See fuller account under Bushmead in V.C.H. Beds. iii, 197–8.
258   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 681. This same Everard had been in Great Staughton as early as 1231, when he was suing Stephen Wolf (Lupus) for land claimed by Stephen, who appears to have carried off his daughter and then claimed it in free marriage with her (Bracton's Note Book, 629).
259   See above under the account of Dillington Manor.
260   It is said that previously to the restoration of 1866 the Beverley tomb stood under this arch.
261   The Tinctures are taken from the Visit. Hunts. 1613 (Camden Soc.) 51, but they are given somewhat differently in the Visit. Beds. (Harl. Soc.) 12. They seem to represent Robert Stoneham, d. 1435, and Maria (Barnack) his wife, but the Burgatt coat may mean that it was put up by his son Robert, d. 1455, who married Katherine Burgatt, and whose heiress married John Broughton; the absence of the Broughton arms (although they did occur in the windows) suggests a date anterior to this marriage.
262   The roof is said to have fallen down and to have cost £40 for its repair, in 1552–3 (Ex. K.R. Ch. Goods, bdle. 3, no. 6).
263   The inscription on the 4th bell seems to suggest an earlier tower; and a bequest of 4d. to the bells, by Thomas Ibott, of Gt. Staughton, 1509 (Wills, Archd. of Hunt. Reg. ii, 109) may perhaps have the same significance.
264   This font bowl was discarded in 1866 and buried in the floor of the south aisle upside down to form a base for a mean modern font. In 1901 it was dug up and re-erected in its present form.
265   Obliterated, should be Shadbolt (T. M. N. Owen, Church Bells of Hunts.).
266   The name should be Gervase Walker.
267   Ex. K.R. Ch. Goods, bdle. 3, no. 5.
268   Rec. of the Archd. of Hunt. no. 231, Terriers.
269   V.C.H. Hunts. i, 341.
270   Cartul. Mon. de Rames. (Rolls Ser.) ii, 136.
271   Wills, Archd. Hunt. Reg. i, fol. 59.
272   The chapel was apparently dedicated to St. Mary.
273   Rot. Rob. Grosseteste (Cant. & York Soc.) 260–1. It is assumed that this Geoffrey represented the Mandevill or Amundeville heirs of the Lovetots referred to in the history of the priory of Huntingdon.
274   Rot. Hund. (Rec. Com.) ii, 681–2.
275   De Banco R. 415, Trin. 37 Edw. III, m. 145.
276   Pope Nich. Tax. (Rec. Com.) 36b.
277   Dugdale, Mon. Angl. vi, 6–7.
278   Cal. Anct. D. iii, D. 902.
279   Cal. Pat. 1377–81, p. 80.
280   Ibid. 1381–5, pp. 37, 51.
281   Ibid. 1391–6, pp. 201, 269, 410.
282   Cal. Anct. D. iii, D. 554.
283   Valor Eccles. i, 430–1; iv, 263.
284   Presentations by St. John's College, Oxford, are to be found in the Institution Books, P.R.O.
285   Feet of F. Hunts. Trin. 11 Geo. III.
286   Ibid. East. 15 Geo. III.
287   Ibid. Hil. 27 Geo. III.

June 2012, Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton, create the Foundation in New York City, USA!
the BLF Royal Foundation www.blfroyalfoundation.org

follow Baron Louis Forino and MCC Petroli Company on Facebook www.facebook.com/mccpetroli

Pubblicato da MCC Petroli Company Limited a 11:32 Nessun commento:

Invia tramite email Postalo sul blog Condividi su Twitter Condividi su Facebook Condividi su Pinterest

Etichette: Barony of Little Staughton

Home page

Iscriviti a: Post (Atom)

Lettori fissi

Archivio blog

· ▼ 2012 (1)

o ▼ gennaio (1)

§ Baron Louis Forino of Little Staughton Knight of M...

Informazioni personali

MCC Petroli Company Limited

Imprenditore nel settore Alta Finanza e Petrolio

Visualizza il mio profilo completo

Modello Watermark. Powered by Blogger.

SCAMMER PSEUDO BARON LUIGI FORINO

BIG FRAUD TO LOAN FROM MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING, MCC INVESTMENT

GANGSTER ORGANIZATIONS (UPDATED).

If you want to know the truth on this self made (and mad!) man, then just read this below:

Do not also be scared when he threatens you with Interpol and with his pseudo lawyers BRANDENBERG, Advokatur und Notaries and Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg with

The following contacts:

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

____________________________

BRANDENBERG

Advokatur und Notariat

Poststrasse 9, CH-6300 Zug

____________________________

JURIS TREUHAND AG

Industriestrasse 47 / Postfach 4461

6304 Zug / Schweiz

Tel.: +41 43 500 22 24

The true contacts of this firm are:

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-ernst-a-brandenberg.html

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

Gründer und Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-manuel-brandenberg.html

Dr. Manuel Brandenberg

Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Executive M.B.L.-HSG

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

In all cases, mad pseudo baron Luigi Forino is liquidating some of his fake companies, see this link with MCC investment :

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

The shaper is being tightening around this new Dr. Mabuse and his mad organization.

They will soon fall down.

From: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>
To: "lawfirm@brandenberg-iur.com" <lawfirm@brandenberg-iur.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:30 AM
Subject: Fw: BIG FRAUD TO LOAN MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING, MCC INVESTMENT

Hello, Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg,

Could you please read the following and get back to me.

Are you the same doctor as:

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

____________________________

BRANDENBERG

Advokatur und Notariat

Poststrasse 9, CH-6300 Zug

____________________________

JURIS TREUHAND AG

Industriestrasse 47 / Postfach 4461

6304 Zug / Schweiz

Tel.: +41 43 500 22 24

Which is different from you contacts:

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

Gründer und Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>
To: "j.zuzak@zuzak.ch" <j.zuzak@zuzak.ch>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:06 AM
Subject: BIG FRAUD TO LOAN MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING, MCC INVESTMENT

BIG FRAUD TO LOAN MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING, MCC INVESTMENT

GANGSTER ORGANIZATIONS

· Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>;

· Friday 11 July at 9:12 AM

· j.zuzak@zuzak.ch

· info@zuzak.ch

Dear Mr. Jaroslav Rudolf Zuzak,

I have been given your details while corresponding with fellows from Czech Republic and Slovakia that have already resorted to your services regarding a scam matter from this organization:

Url http://www.mcc-holding.com

Url http://www.mccpetroli.com

Url http://www.mccinvestment.com

Url http://www.mccconsulting.co.uk/

Could you follow the thread of the following message, then you will get a clear insight on this matter.

Main figures in this dark organization are, Baron Luigi Forino, main Shareholder, CEO (http://www.mccpetroli.com), Jurist Ernst Brandenberg, CEO Charles Blanc )(http://www.mccinvestment.com), CEO Mrs. Pozzi Pedullà, Marina, (http://www.mcc-holding.com) and Financial Director Marc Webb.

In my case, they did not scam me and they could never have succeeded anyway.

They harmed me however as I got the agreement from an investment group in Dubai for advancing me 40 million USD to be given as upfront fees to the the MCC group. The group in Dubai performed a due diligence investigation on the MCC group and found an incredibly great number of compromising links on the MCC group.

I stopped of course any contact with this sad organization but they got back recently to me stating that they had a new team (fraudulous) and with procedures suppressing wholly upfront fees.

This was a new trap as they advocated again for advanced payments while they were liquidating their company ( http://www.mccinvestment.com) (as to past 30 June). These links:

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/pub/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

Added to the actual and hard money swindle against three companies in Czech Republic and Slovakia with all the information contained in this message, including the links, this makes by far enough to engage law and police pursuits against these mad gangsters (I can exhibit correspondences with these misfits corroborating my judgment).

Based on this, I would like to know what are your procedures and conditions (with a first estimation on the costs) for handling this matter.

My aim is to follow the whole thread of the gangster activities of the MCC holding for dismantling it once for all.

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

j.zuzak@zuzak.ch; info@zuzak.ch

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>
To: "josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz" <josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz>; 'Milan.sedlacek' <milan.sedlacek@dicholding.com>
Cc: "denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com" <denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com>; "mares@ibinvestment.eu" <mares@ibinvestment.eu>; "'BTW finance, s.r.o.'" <info@btwfinance.sk>
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Information about Mr.Forino

Hello, Mr. Josef,

Your information is very interesting. Charles Blanc and Ernst Brandenberg exist. This should be the same with Marc Webb and Marina Pozzi Pedula.

The physical addresses,

MCC Holding S.A.

Legal Address: Viale Stefano Franscini 3

6900 Lugano

Operative Address: Rue Du Rhône,14

1204 - Genève

Switzerland

should also be actual ones.

Now, as your fellows from Czech Republic and Slovakia have lost money, my mind is that you should file already complaints to the FBI.

(I have received an email from this address

X-Originating-IP: [209.85.216.49] Milimi Mili <milimin007@gmail.com>;

IP: 209.85.216.49 Near: Mountain View, California, United States

Which means that they either have another fake site or an accomplice in the US.

I have reached Luigi Forino at louisforino@mccpetroli.com but he did not reply me directly and at this step, I have not his IP address.

The objective is that the FBI starts to have a look on the MCC Holding activities.

Once they begin to investigate, then they will unveil and reach the whole truth about these activities.

This is at least a first step that will not need the services of a lawyer.

Once you get a reply from the FBI; then you will advise on a new strategy.

From my side, they did not take me money, which means that I shall be a little slow in my searches.

But, please Mr. Josef, be careful. From my correspondences with them (and especially with Ernst Brandenberg and Luigi Forino), I can certify that these people are mentally disturbed, misfits, fully brain distorted and as a consequence very dangerous.

Even into jail, they will remain dangerous as they have accomplices outside.

And this holds, of course, with the Slovakian friend of Luigi Forino. She should stop at once any contact with such a degenerated person.

From my side, I shall contact several authorities and influent people, not only the FBI, high officials here, the Swiss and Italian Embassies.

If you can with your colleagues forward me any in formation on the local police authorities in Geneva and Lugano, I shall welcome this.

But, at the end, I shall travel. I cannot schedule this just now and I think that I shall reach physically these people.

I shall amil you as soon as I have something new.

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

From: "josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz" <josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz>
To: 'Milan.sedlacek' <milan.sedlacek@dicholding.com>; 'Abdelkader SELLAL' <abisellal@yahoo.com>
Cc: denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com; mares@ibinvestment.eu; "'BTW finance, s.r.o.'" <info@btwfinance.sk>
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 7:18 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Information about Mr.Forino

Děkuji pane Sedláčku za Vaši součinnost, která bude nutná zejména pak pro FBI.

Thank you Mr. Sedláčku for your assistance that will be necessary in particular for the FBI.

Budu velmi rád, když Vám, kteří jste byli finančně poškozeni, dojde alespoň k vrácení Vašich peněz, které byly realizovány na službu, která nebyla provedena, byť byla smluvně závazně dohodnuta.

I will be very glad when you, who you were financially harmed, it will at least return your money, that have been paid for a service, which was not performed, although it has been contractually agreed with binding.

Best regards

Ing.Josef Vavrik – Consultant for the provision of subsidies

EU Subsidy and Funding Consultancy with company EVERYONE s.r.o.

for Czech Republic and whole World

From: Milan.sedlacek [mailto:milan.sedlacek@dicholding.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:48 PM
To: josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz; Abdelkader SELLAL
Cc: denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com; mares@ibinvestment.eu; BTW finance, s.r.o.
Subject: Re[2]: Information about Mr.Forino

Dobrý den pane Vavříku, Hello Mr. Vavříku,

sleduji Vaše emaily. Mohu doplnit, že můj právník ve Švýcarsku JUDr. Jaroslav Zuzák

I'm watching Your emails. I can add that my lawyer in Switzerland, JUDr. Jaroslav Zuzák

http://zuzak.ch/cz2/Team-Advokatni-kancelar-Zuzak-svycarsti-cesti-slovensti-nemecti-advokati-pravnici-Jaroslav-Zuzak-Stany-Wittibschlager-Katarina-Hollosiova-Allan-Pospisil-Blanka-Boukalova.php

info@zuzak.ch www.zuzak.ch j.zuzak@zuzak.ch

byl prý osobně v kontaktu s Dr. Ernst Brandenberg a právníkem MCC Investment SA a prý i komunikoval s panem Charles Blanc.

He was personally in contact with Dr. Ernst Brandenberg and MCC'S lawyer and Investment SA and communicated with Mr. Charles Blanc.

Jelikož však pan JUDr. Zuzák neadekvátně navyšoval požadavky na svůj honorář a výsledek nebyl žádný (jím připravené trestní oznámení bylo odloženo), musel jsem s ním spolupráci ukončit.

However, since Mr. JUDr. Zuzák requirements for its inappropriately raised fee and the result (no criminal complaint prepared by him) was postponed, I had to stop cooperation with him.

Každopádně by mohl poskytnout informace pro FBI, co vlastně on ve Švýcarsku zjistil a s kým jednal.

Anyway, could provide information to the FBI, what he found in Switzerland and with whom he acted.

S pozdravem

With the best regards

Milan Sedláček

----- Původní zpráva -----
Odesilatel: "Abdelkader SELLAL" <abisellal@yahoo.com>
Příjemce: josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz
Kopie: Milan.sedlacek <milan.sedlacek@dicholding.com>, "BTW finance, s.r.o." <info@btwfinance.sk>, mares@ibinvestment.eu, denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com
Datum: 07/08/2014 11:06
Předmět: Re: Information about Mr.Forino

Hello, Mr. Joseph,

This is very important.

If you have any influence onh the Miss from Slovakia, friend of Luigi Forino, my advice if you want to associate her to your searches would be to be very careful.

My mind is that these people can easily transform into true killers.

The best would be that she stops any contact with Luigi Forino. She is in danger because a lot of money is involved in the activities of this damned group.

Best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

From: "josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz" <josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz>
To: 'Abdelkader SELLAL' <abisellal@yahoo.com>; 'ekonstavmat' <denisaburzova@ekonstavmat.com>
Cc: Milan.sedlacek <milan.sedlacek@dicholding.com>; "BTW finance, s.r.o." <info@btwfinance.sk>; mares@ibinvestment.eu
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 9:27 AM
Subject: Information about Mr.Forino

Everything seems to me that this group is only 2 people. Me once Mr. Kreisgarage Forino said that he is the uncle of Mr. Luigi Forino. With Mr. Luigi Forino only personally met Mrs. Burzová from Slovakia from company EKONSTAVMAT. She with him had love affair, and she told me about Luigi Forino. She could be a great witness to these facts.

Best regards

Ing.Josef Vavrik - Consultant for the provision of subsidies

EU Subsidy and Funding Consultancy with company EVERYONE s.r.o.

for Czech Republic and whole World

From: Abdelkader SELLAL [mailto:abisellal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 9:05 AM
To: josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz
Subject: Re: Information from us

Dear Mr. Josef Vavrik,

Your reply is exactly what I feared. Now, Marc Webb, Marina Pozzi Pedula, Charles Blanc, Luigi Forino, Ernst Brandenberg are people that should exist really and physically, as such.

But, even if they truly exist, then we are not sure that we have dealt with the actual ones.

The same holds for their physical addresses in Geneva and Lugano.

There are a lot of fake and false profiles in the Net. I have personally hit against several in the MENA area (mostly fake princes or fake CEOs of investment groups, LinkedIn if full of them).

Which means fake profiles. But I am not surprised with this as the MCC sites are not hosted in Switzerland.

I think that this will be long, even for the FBI to untangle such a skein.

I shall take this into account in my searches.

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL

From: "josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz" <josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz>
To: 'Abdelkader SELLAL' <abisellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: Information from us

Mr. Abdelkader

with anyone I've met in person. Only we wrote emails, skype, SMS. I communicated by phone with Mr. Kreisgarage Forino by phone +41794605577. Several times I wrote Louigi Forino SMS from your phone +33667697947. All sms I have saved. I also store all Skype communications.

Best regards

Ing.Josef Vavrik - Consultant for the provision of subsidies

EU Subsidy and Funding Consultancy with company EVERYONE s.r.o.

for Czech Republic and whole World

From: Abdelkader SELLAL [mailto:abisellal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:47 AM
To: josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz; info@btwfinance.sk; Milan.sedlacek; info@ibinvestment.eu; mares@ibinvestment.eu; gd@dobrauz.ch; abdsellal@yahoo.com
Subject: Fw: Information from us

Dear Mr. Josef Vavrik,

Could you, please give me few details on the following?

Have you ever met with Marc Webb, Charles Blanc and Marina Pozzi Pedula (Also with Luigi Forino)?

Have you ever been at these addresses?

MCC Holding S.A.

Legal Address: Viale Stefano Franscini 3

6900 Lugano

Operative Address: Rue Du Rhône,14

1204 - Genève

Switzerland

Can you provide me with one or several addresses from local police offices in Geneva and Lugano, including emails, phone numbers and physical locations?

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz" <josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz>
To: gd@dobrauz.ch; 'Abdelkader SELLAL' <abisellal@yahoo.com>; abdsellal@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 7:03 AM
Subject: Information from us

Dear Mr.Dobrauz

Also we informed the FBI. Main decent person who has the care of Mr. Abdelkader Sellall. I wish you a wonderful day and I wish you much success at work.

Best regards

Ing.Josef Vavrik - Consultant for the provision of subsidies

EU Subsidy and Funding Consultancy with company EVERYONE s.r.o.

for Czech Republic and whole World

From: Abdelkader SELLAL [mailto:abisellal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 4:24 AM
To: josef.vavrik@airforlife.cz; info@btwfinance.sk; Milan.sedlacek; info@ibinvestment.eu; mares@ibinvestment.eu; abdsellal@yahoo.com
Subject: Fw: BIG FRAUD TO LOAN IN INTERNET FROM MCC INVESTMENT.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Norfolk_FO@ic.fbi.gov" <Norfolk_FO@ic.fbi.gov>
To: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: BIG FRAUD TO LOAN IN INTERNET FROM MCC INVESTMENT.

Please file a complaint with the Internet Crimes Complaint Center at www.ic3.gov.

Thank you,

FBI

Norfolk

From: Abdelkader SELLAL [abisellal@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:11 AM
To: Miami; Richmond; Norfolk_FO@ic.fbi.gov; Tampa Division; Seattle.FBI; Washington Field; MCC Investment:: Sales Office Department; MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director; MCC Holding:: Pozzi Pedulla Marina/CEO; Sekretariat Brandenberg; MCC Investment:: Charles Blanc/CEO
Subject: BIG FRAUD TO LOAN IN INTERNET FROM MCC INVESTMENT.

BIG FRAUD TO LOAN IN INTERNET FROM MCC INVESTMENT.

Dear from FBI,

I am presenting in the sequel a sequence of facts, correspondences and documents showing the incredible extent of fraud, swindle, scam and cheating to loan in the Internet from a sad organization whose links in the Net read :

http://www.mccfinance.com

http://www.mccinvestment.com

I am forwarding few of my correspondences with them as well as documents describing their misdeeds.

But, please, for beginning, have a look on the following Email and IP addresses :

MCC Investment:: Sales Office Department <sales@mccinvestment.com>;

X-Originating-IP: [216.22.18.200] sales@mccfinance.com

MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director <marc.webb@mccinvestment.com>;

X-Originating-IP: [216.22.18.200] marc.webb@mccinvestment.com

pozzi.pedulla.marina@mcc-holding.com

X-Originating-IP: [72.29.77.42] MCC Holding:: Pozzi Pedulla Marina/CEO <pozzi.pedulla.marina@mcc-holding.com>

Blanc.Charles@mccinvestment.com

X-Originating-IP: [72.29.77.42] MCC Investment:: Charles Blanc/CEO <blanc.charles@mccinvestment.com>;

ernst.brandenberg@juristreuhand.com X-Originating-IP: [216.22.18.212]

I am enclosing the headers from which I have extracted these IP addresses.

Now, there are two IP addresses for five email addresses.

The locations corresponding to the IP addresses read and show:

http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/ip/216.22.18.212 IP: 216.22.18.212 Near: Mclean, Virginia, United States

http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/ip/72.29.77.42 IP: 72.29.77.42 Near: Orlando, Florida, United States

The people to whom these addresses belong are:

MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Financial Division

Board Member

Blanc Charles, CEO, mcc Investment SA, Geneva (Switzerland)

Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Financial Division

Board Member

Marc Webb, Financial Director, mcc International Investment Co.Ltd., Geneva (Switzerland)

Registered Office: RM 19C, Lockhart CTR 301-307, Lockhart rd Wan Chai, Hong Kong

Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

NEW YORK OFFICE

Medley Capital Corporation
375 Park Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10152

http://www.mccfinance.com

http://www.mccinvestment.com

_________________________

mcc Holding S.A.

Holding Group of companies

Board Member

Mrs. Pozzi Pedullà, Marina, President, Geneva Area, Switzerland

Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

FAX: (+41)225180898 //(+1)8592012788 //(+39)0244386056

================================================

Part of the MCC Petroli Company (Joint-Stock)

( Swiss, Malta, UK, UAE, USA, Italy,China )

and Part of the MCC Holding (Joint-Stock)

( Swiss, Malta, USA, Hong Kong )

Url http://www.mcc-holding.com

Url http://www.mccpetroli.com

Url http://www.mccinvestment.com

Url http://www.mccconsulting.co.uk

The foregoing are the main people in this Dr. Mabuse organization.

All are supposed to be based here:

MCC Holding S.A.

Legal Address: Viale Stefano Franscini 3

6900 Lugano

Operative Address: Rue Du Rhône,14

1204 - Genève

Switzerland

This is enough to show that MCC Investment is a trash organization that foams the Net with a complete impunity, swindling and scamming clients using legally covered procedures.

Try to follow the links of their sites for discovering that they can scam clients with avoiding being pursued by Interpol or any other police office.

I shall detail all their methods in a next sending. I have not mentioned in the previous a fourth personage, perhaps the most important among them, Baron Luigi Forino, so called main shareholder of their gangster holding (http://www.mccpetroli.com).

My present main worry is to find the exact physical addresses in the US corresponding to the two previous IP addresses,

http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/ip/216.22.18.212 IP: 216.22.18.212 Near: Mclean, Virginia, United States

http://ip-address-lookup-v4.com/ip/72.29.77.42 IP: 72.29.77.42 Near: Orlando, Florida, United States

Afterwards, I shall go towards the Police Authorities in Geneva for unveiling the true and actual identities of the previous sad people who belong to all kinds of people and individuals that render this planet a Hell while it should be just a Heaven.

Dear from the FBI, your responsibility is engaged. You should or even you must make all light regarding this damned organization named MCC Investment. It is upon the honor of your country, the United States of America that instead being an example and a model in this planet seem to behave the exact converse at the beginning of this century.

Try to refute that the US are the country of Alphonse Capone and also Jimmy Hoffa.

Do you remember Jimmy Hoffa?

I shall mail you again until I have unveiled all activities of this gangster organization named MCC Investment.

I shall also contact Interpol.

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

Abdelkader SELLAL , Entrepreneur

New projects ventures: Geodesy, Space, Energy and Water.

abisellal@yahoo.com

106, rue Parnet, Hussein-Dey, Alger, Algeria.

Tel : 00 213 (0) 21 77 94 04

Mobile: 00 213 (0) 5 60 42 50 22

http://www.naymz.com/anwarsellal-6p64x

http://billionaireselite.ning.com/profile/AbdelkaderSELLAL

https://www.xing.com/profiles/Abdelkader_SELLAL3

http://about.me/abdelkadersellal

FAKE AND FRAUDULOUS LOAN OFFER FROM GANGSTER COMPANIES MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING AND MCC INVESTMENT (UPDATED).

The following is another proof, this time related to loan offer, of the gangster methods of the fake companies MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING AND MCC INVESTMENT with fake staffs and CEOs, fake baron Luigi Forino, fake CEO Marina Pozzi Pedula, fake CEO Charles Blanc, fake Financial Director Marc Webb, fake Jurist and fake Dr. Ernst Brandenberg (email: ernst.brandenberg@juristreuhand.com while the email of the actual Ernst Brandenberg is lawfirm@brandenberg-iur.ch with site http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/home.html)

In my case, they did not scam me and they could never have succeeded anyway.

I stopped of course any contact with this sad organization but they got back recently to me stating that they had a new team (fraudulous) and with procedures suppressing wholly upfront fees.

This was a new trap as they advocated again for advanced payments while they were liquidating their company ( http://www.mccinvestment.com) (as to past 30 June). These links:

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/pub/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

See also below, the villainous letter addressed to me by Charles Blanc, entitled “Loan Clarifications”.

If you want to know the truth on this self made (and mad!) man, then just read this below:

Do not also be scared when he threatens you with Interpol and with his pseudo lawyers BRANDENBERG, Advokatur und Notaries and Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg with

The following contacts:

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

____________________________

BRANDENBERG

Advokatur und Notariat

Poststrasse 9, CH-6300 Zug

____________________________

JURIS TREUHAND AG

Industriestrasse 47 / Postfach 4461

6304 Zug / Schweiz

Tel.: +41 43 500 22 24

The true contacts of this firm are:

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-ernst-a-brandenberg.html

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

Gründer und Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-manuel-brandenberg.html

Dr. Manuel Brandenberg

Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Executive M.B.L.-HSG

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

In all cases, mad pseudo baron Luigi Forino is liquidating some of his fake companies, see this link with MCC investment :

http://www.moneyhouse.ch/fr/u/mcc_investment_sa_CH-660.2.572.007-7.htm

The shaper is being tightening around this new Dr. Mabuse and his mad organization.

They will soon fall down.

Abdelkader SELLAL Jul 2

To MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director abdsellal@yahoo.com

MCC Investment:: Sales Office Department pozzi.pedulla.marina@mcc-holding.com

Blanc.Charles@mccinvestment.com Sekretariat Brandenberg

TRY TO HAVE A LOOK ON THE FOLLOWING COMMON IP ADDRESS 216.22.18.200 FOR THE TWO EMAIL ADDRESSES:

MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director <marc.webb@mccinvestment.com>;

http://www.mccfinance.com

meant to be located in Switzerland (at least for the second address).

I shall take all my time for alerting Interpol.

It is fully unacceptable that such people like you can act with complete impunity.

Abdelkader SELLAL.

IP: 216.22.18.200

Near: Mclean, Virginia, United States

From: MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director <marc.webb@mccinvestment.com>
To: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>; "abdsellal@yahoo.com" <abdsellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Missing Documents

Are you aware of all the ADVANCED costs?

Because if you are not aware, we don’t need you to lose your time applying for a financial service that you are not able to pay for the costs

Regards

Best Regards

_______________________________________________

MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Financial Division

Board Member

Marc Webb, Financial Director, mcc International Investment Co.Ltd., Geneva (Switzerland)

Registered Office: RM 19C, Lockhart CTR 301-307, Lockhart rd Wan Chai, Hong Kong

Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

NEW YORK OFFICE

Medley Capital Corporation
375 Park Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10152

http://www.mccinvestment.com

Abdelkader SELLAL Jul 2

To MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director abdsellal@yahoo.com

sales@mccinvestment.com

Dear Mr. Marc Webb,

I am retaining your new disposition allowing to apply for a special due diligence phase (with zero upfront fees) and I am ready to make available a bank statement declaring that I am able to refund the loan in your described terms.

This disposition of yours:

“Furthermore: If your Bank is able to issue officially to our company and we will verify via Swift Bank to Bank Bases, declaring that “ We ‘Name of the Bank’ with legal responsibility declare that our customer ‘XXX’ is able to pay back the Loan in the amount of XXX Million $/€/£ for the Project XXXX for the duration of Years XXX, plus the annual debit interest in terms of XXX $/€/£, to be wired to the Lender Company. XXX— “ , in that case we can apply for a special Due Diligence Phase and avoid totally the costs of the Loan! - ask for more info to the sales office.”

I want to strengthen this however with presenting to the bank (and by the same way to your group), a new refined Business Plan with thoroughly updated financial projections related to my projects.

I have proposed an amortization table in the range of six years (2016 -2021 for refunding the loan (2.5 billion USD plus around 400 million USD of total interest).

Except for the first year, 2016, I do not expect profits less than one billion USD per year.

Which means that I can easily refund the whole loan plus its interest in the frame of three years.

And this will be my priority, that is to refund the loan as fast as possible.

What I am writing and stating will be better trusted when I present to your group and to the bank full details on all the activities that I am planning with the money of the loan with the corresponding financial projections.

But this will remain only first estimations. Once I have begun the launching of the projects themselves, then new activities will appear that will bring their own financial projections.

This job of refining my financial projections will take me this whole month of July.

The geodetic activities in the European Continent will be those on which I am most relying for generating the greatest earnings.

I shall also try to find the two hotels that I want in my loan portfolio and also on which media I am going to invest (Die Zeit in Germany is my first target), already before the release of the loan.

This will allow me to assess and add with a good accuracy the financial projections related to these activities.

The foregoing means that I need to prepare a huge set of documents, few of them being already ready (those with technical features) and others, mainly with financial costs and projections, needing to be fully established.

August is generally an empty month, especially for reaching contacts. This means that I expect to render a perfect copy of what I am stating in the run of next September.

Said otherwise, I expect to deliver you a bank statement as you are requesting it in the run of next September.

Meanwhile, I am considering the idea of associating partners to my projects, already, before launching them.

I have several options available (two potential partners from California, one in Dubai, two in Austria, two in Paris, two others here in Algiers).

I can also rely on the whole geodetic background of the Technical University of graz that I am preparing to solicit in its whole for ensuring the perfect managing of my projects (at least part of them, those related to Geodesy and Space).

I have among my contacts wealthy industrials that can be potential partners for my projects.

But if I get back to you with a partner, then I shall favour professionals with strong technical background over equity holders. This is just because I want to rely first on the value of my projects, as well as on their potential physical collaterals and their financial projections.

I shall welcome any information from your Sales Services that can help me improve and tune the foregoing shaping of my projects and of your loan.

With my best regards,

Abdelkader SELLAL.

P.S. I have already sent you a ZIP file containing several identity documents of mine. I am extracting in this sending a scan of my Pass in two variants as the colours in both are somewhat different.

From: MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director <marc.webb@mccinvestment.com>
To: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>; "abdsellal@yahoo.com" <abdsellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:11 AM
Subject: Missing Documents

Dear Customer,

MCC Finance Ltd., the Medley Capital Corporation (MCC) -NYSE in JV with MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd. ( Singapore ) BSE:531725 | 58888:milc | ISIN code:INE786C01012

are proud to announce that we accepted your project*.

In order to proceed to the loan we request the following documents.

List of documents:

1. LOI – Letter of Intent as per our template file = …missing …ENCLOSED

2. CIS – Client Information Sheet as per our template file = … OK …UPDATED

3. Extract of the Chamber of commerce for the Borrower's company = … missing … REFER TO LOI

4. Passport of the Legal Representative, color copy = … missing … ENCLOSED

5. Business Plan = … OK …TO BE THOROUGHLY COMPLETED AND UPDATED

6. Bank Statement of account not older than 1 week with 2 bank officers seal/print = … missing …REFER TO LOI

Once we receive this full set of documents, we will proceed.

Please follow our standards and give us the LOI and CIS as per our attached SAMPLE.

In case your company is not financial able to support the whole costs to acquire the loan, or, If you could do with an equity partnership, or, require more than one investor that can be part of your project(s), we have big portfolio here in Switzerland via our banks, of large corporations that may be interested to your project (s)and share with you the costs and revenue.

NOTE:

So if you need this, after the Due Diligence & insurance phase, that costs 0,29% only, to our company, we will immediately work for you as international financial consulting firms to manage your project and bring it to the top companies/investors attention.

REMARKS SUMMARY: We can arrange any kind of finance to be built on a Debit Line from 5m$/€/£ up to 447,4 Billion USD$/EURO/GBP - Our financial structure via notary firm will sell the content of this debit line (i.e. The funds ), to the borrower in a private sales of private funds ( i.e. Private Bank Loan )Our debit interest is 2,45% each year up to 15 year contract.Our costs, mandatory in advance, as we don't work for free : 0,29% for the due diligence,insurance and to engage our firm 2,8% for the whole loan application.

Important Notice: IF YOU NEED INVESTOR TO BE WITH YOU IN JOINT-VENTURE AND ABSORB PART OF YOUR COSTS, WE HAVE INVESTORS COMING FROM THE PRIVATE BANK PORTFOLIO OF UBI BANK AND COMMERZBANK ( ex. DRESDNER BANK). ASK TO OUR STAFF TO ASSSIT YOU AND ILLUSTRATE HOW TO OBTAIN A LOAN WITHOUT SPENDING 1 CENT MORE THAN THE DUE DILIGENCE!

Furthermore: If your Bank is able to issue officially to our company and we will verify via Swift Bank to Bank Bases, declaring that “ We ‘Name of the Bank’ with legal responsibility declare that our customer ‘XXX’ is able to pay back the Loan in the amount of XXX Million $/€/£ for the Project XXXX for the duration of Years XXX, plus the annual debit interest in terms of XXX $/€/£, to be wired to the Lender Company. XXX— “ , in that case we can apply for a special Due Diligence Phase and avoid totally the costs of the Loan! - ask for more info to the sales office.

Important Notice: if the Borrower have a project at least of 50 Million $/€/£, we can use an Escrow Company to hold and guarantee such costs. Also we are open to evaluate your Escrow known corporations or any other Escrow that you work with or you can trust! So we can arrange the Loan without any upfront Costs !!!

Important Notice: if the Borrower have already a BG issued from Top 25 Word Bank (AAA), we can arrange the Loan without any upfront Costs! !!!

In fact, if the borrower is in a possession of any BG ( Bank Guarantee ) from Top 25 World Bank, we can arrange the Loan without any UPFRONT PAYMENT! ( Apart of the Due Diligence, that is indeed not part of our Company Job but an External Corporation “Ernst & Young Ltd.” that do it for our company )

WE CAN EXECUTE LOANS PER TRANCHES ! FIRST MINIMUM TRANCHE 30% OF THE PROJECT !!!( Minimum project required 15 million $/€/£ )

Look forward to your swift response

Best Regards

_______________________________________________

MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Financial Division

Board Member

Marc Webb, Financial Director,mcc Investment SA, Geneva (Switzerland)Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

NEW YORK OFFICE

Medley Capital Corporation
375 Park Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10152

http://www.mccfinance.com

http://www.mccinvestment.com

From: MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director <marc.webb@mccinvestment.com>
To: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>; "abdsellal@yahoo.com" <abdsellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 11:11 AM
Subject: Missing Documents

Dear Customer,

MCC Finance Ltd., the Medley Capital Corporation (MCC) -NYSE in JV with MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd. ( Singapore ) BSE:531725 | 58888:milc | ISIN code:INE786C01012are proud to announce that we accepted your project*.In order to proceed to the loan we request the following documents.List of documents: 1. LOI – Letter of Intent as per our template file = …missing …2. CIS – Client Information Sheet as per our template file = … OK …3. Extract of the Chamber of commerce for the Borrower's company = … missing … 4. Passport of the Legal Representative, color copy = … missing … 5. Business Plan = … OK …6. Bank Statement of account not older than 1 week with 2 bank officers seal/print = … missing …Once we receive this full set of documents, we will proceed.Please follow our standards and give us the LOI and CIS as per our attached SAMPLE.In case your company is not financial able to support the whole costs to acquire the loan, or, If you could do with an equity partnership, or, require more than one investor that can be part of your project(s), we have big portfolio here in Switzerland via our banks, of large corporations that may be interested to your project (s)and share with you the costs and revenue.NOTE:So if you need this, after the Due Diligence & insurance phase, that costs 0,29% only, to our company, we will immediately work for you as international financial consulting firms to manage your project and bring it to the top companies/investors attention.REMARKS SUMMARY: We can arrange any kind of finance to be built on a Debit Line from 5m$/€/£ up to 447,4 Billion USD$/EURO/GBP - Our financial structure via notary firm will sell the content of this debit line (i.e. The funds ), to the borrower in a private sales of private funds ( i.e. Private Bank Loan )Our debit interest is 2,45% each year up to 15 year contract.Our costs, mandatory in advance, as we don't work for free : 0,29% for the due diligence,insurance and to engage our firm 2,8% for the whole loan application.Important Notice: IF YOU NEED INVESTOR TO BE WITH YOU IN JOINT-VENTURE AND ABSORB PART OF YOUR COSTS, WE HAVE INVESTORS COMING FROM THE PRIVATE BANK PORTFOLIO OF UBI BANK AND COMMERZBANK ( ex. DRESDNER BANK). ASK TO OUR STAFF TO ASSSIT YOU AND ILLUSTRATE HOW TO OBTAIN A LOAN WITHOUT SPENDING 1 CENT MORE THAN THE DUE DILIGENCE!

Important Notice: if the Borrower have a project at least of 50 Million $/€/£, we can use an Escrow Company to hold and guarantee such costs. Also we are open to evaluate your Escrow known corporations or any other Escrow that you work with or you can trust! So we can arrange the Loan without any upfront Costs !!!Important Notice: if the Borrower have already a BG issued from Top 25 Word Bank (AAA), we can arrange the Loan without any upfront Costs! !!!In fact, if the borrower is in a possession of any BG ( Bank Guarantee ) from Top 25 World Bank, we can arrange the Loan without any UPFRONT PAYMENT! ( Apart of the Due Diligence, that is indeed not part of our Company Job but an External Corporation “Ernst & Young Ltd.” that do it for our company )WE CAN EXECUTE LOANS PER TRANCHES ! FIRST MINIMUM TRANCHE 30% OF THE PROJECT !!!( Minimum project required 15 million $/€/£ )Look forward to your swift responseBest Regards_______________________________________________MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.Financial DivisionBoard Member Marc Webb, Financial Director,mcc Investment SA, Geneva (Switzerland)Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )NEW YORK OFFICEMedley Capital Corporation375 Park Avenue33rd FloorNew York, NY 10152http://www.mccfinance.comhttp://www.mccinvestment.com

Abdelkader SELLAL Jul 2

To MCC Investment:: Charles Blanc/CEO abdsellal@yahoo.com

MCC Investment:: Marc Webb/Director Sekretariat Brandenberg

pozzi.pedulla.marina@mcc-holding.com MCC Investment:: Sales Office Department

These are paths of your IP Adress.

I shall make a new project of mine, unveiling all activities of your company (rather your organization).

And sequentially, alerting Interpol with due arguments and proofs.

Abdelkader SELLAL.

X-Originating-IP: [72.29.77.42] MCC Investment:: Charles Blanc/CEO <blanc.charles@mccinvestment.com>;

IP: 72.29.77.42

Near: Orlando, Florida, United States

Host name:

72.29.77.42 - IP in United States, Orlando - Comments and Complaints

From: MCC Investment:: Charles Blanc/CEO <blanc.charles@mccinvestment.com>
To: Abdelkader SELLAL <abisellal@yahoo.com>; "abdsellal@yahoo.com" <abdsellal@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 9:25 AM

Subject: Loan Clarifications

Dear Customer,

If you don’t read the content of our emails but only the Subject – you will never know what we are selling!

anyway:

Follow my presentation and more about this private sales of private funds (i.e. Private Bank Loan):

1. The way of paying the charges which equal 2.8 ( from loan minimum 5m$ up to 447.4 Billions USD$ ) :

The private sales of private funds ( i.e. Private bank loan ) is a complex mechanism of creating a Debit line for a company , part of an Holding Structured group of companies, and resell this debit as a Loan to a private customer ( the borrower)

The most important think is, and i think all of us need maximum understandings:

1. MCC holding, MCC Finance, MCC Investment & Leasing, MCC Consulting, ARE NOT A BANK!

2. This company work with another company of the MCC Group, into Financial fields

3. This company are an holding structured into commodity and project financing!

4. The private sales of private funds are totally not a BANK LOAN!

5. We, MCC are in JV with Swiss Banks to arrange a debit line on their Bank Platform and we can do this because we have huge funds inside our Associate crude oil bank account in HSBC - HK

6. The holding company will arrange the Lock of the requested funds on behalf the MCC Investment S.A.

7. MCC Investment will ask to HSBC in Geneva to furnish a Debit Line

8. MCC Investment will swift to MCC Holding S.A. Via Bank Swift MT760 the required capability

9. MCC Holding will swift MT760 to MCC Holding (Honk Kong) Corp.Ltd in China via HSBC

10. HSBC Bank will give to MCC the CREDIT LINE of XXX Loan face value,…

11. And, finally, after 20 working days, MCC will perform the sales as per contract sending in one MT/103 concerning "OUR DEBIT" to our client beneficiary bank account as a LOAN ( but we can call this financial strategy product/service.. .in any name…) but it is the only legal way to sell MONEY without the risk to do a MONEY-LAUNDERING !!

All will be processed as per law

All will be done per bank to bank basis

If you understand this, we can proceed ( and you will understand that all this steps will be generated by your % of costs )

If you don't understand this,, no problem, but we are afraid to don't be able to help you!

Furthermore we arranged to give to our customers max safety, the use of Their Favorite Escrow to keep in hold the costs that we need to work with!

The Escrow must be a good reputable company, international well known to our Insurance Corporation, so we can Obtain the required costs from Our bank as a temporary discount -

In this way, our company can work to arrange the Loan for you as we have the costs required to arrange all the steps of our job from our bank directly and you, the borrower, keep your money in a safe place -

When the mutual conditions will be covenant and performed as per agreement, our company will be repaid from the Escrow and our bank temporary debit repaid immediately.

So No exposition for us, no Risk for you.

Be Aware that Escrow can be used only for Loans > 50m $/€&£ - not for small project.

For Small project, you have to pay the costs as required in advance as we have no way to ask to our bank such costs for you nor for the execution of our job for and your behalf.

We use as only legal and valid documents the EDT (Electronically Documentary Transmission) as this financial company structure is geographically distributed in Switzerland, Netherlands, UK and China

THIS COMPANY (THE LENDER) DOES NOT ALLOW THE BORROWER TO USE OUR PRIVATE DOCUMENTS FOR TRADING OR TO TRY TO ASK FOR ADVANCED CREDIT FACILITIES TO HIS OR ANY BANK. WE WILL CLAIM TO THE AUTHORITIES ANY ILLEGALITY THAT COULD BE DISCOVERED FROM THIS COMPANY COMING FROM THE ILLEGAL USE OF OUR CREDITS, DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATIONS.

If all our Terms and Procedures are not suitable to your company, we will be very glad if you can accept to look for other private Lenders on the Market.

Or Better to Ask directly to your estimated bank institute if they are able to Funds your project with better conditions than MCC !

Furthermore: to AVOID SCAMS!

Our company have introduced to let the borrower pay immediately for the Due-Diligence and insurance costs:

As i suppose this is normal for any company to find a way to Protect and be safe into any kind of Business – Also MCC ( the Lender ), as we are not a Bank and we have No Legal way to lock any asset of the Borrower for future safety if our Funds collected will disappear with the Borrower in the Future for any reason…

We arranged with a Big insurance company in London ( Lloyds UK ), to cover and protect MCC Investment from any loss, purchasing a Policy of Insurance that will cover 110% of your project exposition for our company.

To buy such Policy of Insurance, the Lloyds UK ask mandatory to our company to issue/furnish to them a valid Due Diligence & Credit Report of our customer and their project.

Our company work with Ernst & Young Ltd in UK -

So we engage that Audit Corporation to work for our company and investigate on your company, on any legal person that have >25% of shares and power within your corporation ( the Borrower ) and the project, your financial status and capability to repay the Loan to our company in the next future… etc..

All the JOB, will costs to MCC Investment in totality the 0,29% of your project face value.

Of course is not part of our Job to do this nor of our Loan as offered to you, but without this D.D. Phase, we will not agree to proceed as our Exposition could be huge and we ( as i think also you or any company ) don’t want to risk 1 cent of our money into any hazard Business.

For Example on a Loan face value of 5m$, our company total costs will be 2.8% (i.e. = 140,000 USD$), where, at MOU (Memorandum of Understanding for Due Diligence Phase), our company will invoice the due-diligence costs immediately, in terms of 0,29%= 14'500$

After that we instructed our due diligence via international law firm ( Auditing firms Ernst & Young ) and we applied for the insurance on your project with Lloyds UK, we will be very happy to issue the Loan Agreement.

After that, the aforesaid loan agreement will be signed by both parties, notarized and registered by our Notary, our company will issue the invoice of the balance of such loan costs.

As explained before, if your project is >50m, such invoice will be discounted from one of our banks in Switzerland belong the Escrow Agreement that we will sign with your Escrow company. So our bank will give to us such costs and we will execute also the Due Diligence Phase.

But if the Project is less then 50m, we have no way to finance the costs for you and you must pay it in advance to our Holding structure – no other way.

This is also an evidence of your reliability, honesty, trust and transparency; all feature that we need to be part of our client to be into our business.

I am sure that your will act immediately in a professional way, agree and we can proceed our job as our usual.

And Last : We are not an Internet Corporation, we are on the Stock Exchange and registered and active in Switzerland since 2007 with the Investment Company and 2003 with the Holding Company -

Active and Legal Operating with all the Licenses, Employers, Offices, TAXes Paid and Annual Return registered into the Official Swiss Gazette.

We don’t like "Google Maniacs" so avoid any reply with stupid sentences grabbed from the Internet posted by unknown people that have nothing to do when they are sitted on any StarBuck Coffe, that will not found any reply in this organization but only a big fast Reject without any notice from our side.

NOTE: THE DUE DILIGENCE IS NOT PART OF OUR JOB NOR OF OUR LOANS. WILL BE EXECUTED FOR OUR COMPANY BY ERNST & YOUNG CO.LTD. AND LLOYDS UK CORPORATIONS.

EVEN IF YOUR LOAN IS SMALL OR BIG, THE DUE DILIGENCE IS YOUR COSTS AND MUST BE AT YOUR CHARGE ONLY. WE ARE NOT WILLING TO SUPPORT PRELIMINARY COSTS THAT ARE NOT PART OF OUR JOB NOR OF ANY SERVICE THAT WE ARE GOING TO OFFER. THANK YOU FOR KINDLY UNDERSTANDING.

All the best.

Thanks for understanding

Best Regards

_______________________________________________

MCC Finance Ltd. & MCC Investment and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Financial Division

Board Member

Blanc Charles, CEO, mcc Investment SA, Geneva (Switzerland)

Tel. : +41 22 533 0201 (central switchboard)

Skype : mccinvestments ( Business CRM Automatic System-Skype Compatible )

NEW YORK OFFICE

Medley Capital Corporation
375 Park Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10152

http://www.mccfinance.com

http://www.mccinvestment.com

FAKE AND FRAUDULOUS NEW TEAM AT GANGSTER COMPANIES MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING AND MCC INVESTMENT (UPDATED).

The following is a new proof of the gangster methods of the fake companies MCC METROPOLI, MCC HOLDING AND MCC INVESTMENT with fake staffs and CEOs, fake baron Luigi Forino, fake CEO Marina Pozzi Pedula, fake CEO Charles Blanc, fake Financial Director Marc Webb, fake Jurist and fake Dr. Ernst Brandenberg (email: ernst.brandenberg@juristreuhand.com while the email of the actual Ernst Brandenberg is lawfirm@brandenberg-iur.ch with site http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/home.html)

If you want to know the truth on this self made (and mad!) man, then just read this below:

Do not also be scared when he threatens you with Interpol and with his pseudo lawyers BRANDENBERG, Advokatur und Notaries and Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg with

The following contacts:

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

____________________________

BRANDENBERG

Advokatur und Notariat

Poststrasse 9, CH-6300 Zug

____________________________

JURIS TREUHAND AG

Industriestrasse 47 / Postfach 4461

6304 Zug / Schweiz

Tel.: +41 43 500 22 24

Sekretariat Brandenberg <ernst.brandenberg@juristreuhand.com>

The true contacts of this firm are:

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-ernst-a-brandenberg.html

Dr. Ernst A. Brandenberg

Gründer und Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04

http://www.brandenberg-iur.ch/anwaelte/dr-manuel-brandenberg.html

Dr. Manuel Brandenberg

Partner

Rechtsanwalt und Urkundsperson (Notar)

Executive M.B.L.-HSG

Tel. +41 (0)41 726 40 00
Fax +41 (0)41 726 40 04